|
BIOEN 509: Bioengineering Departmental Seminar
Winter & Spring 2012
Location: Bioengineering Seminar Room, William H Foege Building N130
Time: Thursday 12:30 - 1:20 pm
Email contact: bioetalk@u.washington.edu (same email: bioetalk@uw.edu) Grading Policy: Grades will be awarded on a credit/no credit (CR/NC) basis as follows:
Students who attend the lecture in-person:
1. Must attend a minimum of NINE (9) lectures in person and actively participate in discussions (PLEASE SIGN IN)
2. Must write a minimum of THREE (3) 1-page critique on lectures you attend in person, see guidelines below
3. For every lecture not able to attend in person, must watch the online video and submit a critique on it. This is in addition to the 3-critique minimum requirement.
Students who are unable to attend the lecture in-person:
1. Must watch the lectures online
2. Submit 9 out of 10 1-page critiques on the weekly lectures during the quarter
Calculation Table for the # of required critiques (Due to a cancelation, use the numbers in red for Winter quarter 2012)
# of lectures attended in person |
# of lectures watched online |
# of critiques needs to be submitted |
10 (9) |
0 |
3 |
9 (8) |
1 |
3 |
8 (7) |
2 |
4 (3 from the 8 (7) attended in person + 1 from the 2 watched online) |
7 (6) |
3 |
5 (3 from the 7 (6) attended in person + 2 from the 3 watched online) |
6 (5) |
4 |
6 (3 from the 6 (5) attended in person + 3 from the 4 watched online) |
5 (4) |
5 |
7 (3 from the 5 (4) attended in person + 4 from the 5 watched online) |
4 (3) |
6 |
8 (3 from the 4 (3) attended in person + 5 from the 6 watched online) |
3 (2) |
7 |
9 (8) |
2 (1) |
8 |
9 (8) |
1 (0) |
9 |
9 (8) |
0 |
10 |
9 |
Lecture critique guidelines:
1. Critique is limited to one page, Word format, font size=11 or 12, saved as .pdf)
2. Critiques should be submitted in .pdf format as an attachment to bioetalk@uw.edu, due by Thursday March 15 for 2012 Winter quarter, and Thursday June 7 for 2012 Spring quarter. THE SUBJECT OF YOUR EMAIL SHOULD BE "Your Lastname First initial, Lecture # Critique". For example "Yager P., Lecture 1 Critique"
3.Describe weak and strong points; good and bad features
4.Identify important principles
5.New information gathered; new things learned
6.Present your perspectives on lecture’s topic
7.Criticize the presentation itself. How could it be improved?
Note: Due to lack of TAs, feedback on critiques will not be provided during the quarter. Grading of all submitted critiques will be done at the end of the quarter. |
