Research Paper and Presentation
Guidelines
Case Study of the
CEP 302 Winter
2004, Cohort A
Purpose
The idea of this research
project is for each of you to examine a particular element of the environment
in the
Topic, question, and argument
Research
projects are not simply recitations of data a researcher has collected. Rather they are arguments a researcher makes by using the data s/he has
collected. In going about constructing
your paper, several steps are important.
The first step is for you to generate your research topic. For example,
you might be interested in the question of environmental justice as it applies
to siting noxious facilities in the area. The next, and far more crucial (as well as
difficult), step is to formulate your research
question. In the EJ case, you might
ask “is the location of the X paint factory in
You
needn’t follow these examples slavishly.
For example, you might also ask research questions about theory—“is the
concept of livability as understood in the literature a good approximation of
how people in
Sources
We encourage you to engage
in primary research. Primary research
can be loosely defined as using sources in their original form, without
interpretation by another researcher.
Some of the materials you might use could be letters, journals,
interviews, government land office records, pamphlets, observation at meetings,
and treaties. Secondary sources involve information gathered and presented by
someone other than you. Examples are
things like newspaper articles, books, and other research studies.
Research Project
Guidelines
·
7-10 pages
·
typed
·
double spaced
·
stapled
·
12-point Times
(or Times New Roman) font
·
1-inch margins on
all sides
·
title pages are
OK
·
use in-text
citations, e.g. (Tuan, p. 4)
·
works cited list
at end, using MLA format (http://www.lib.washington.edu/help/guides/44MLA.pdf)
Components of your Paper
·
Title
·
Introduction—sets the context and
background of the project, and clearly states
the paper’s main argument in the first paragraph (so the reader isn’t
guessing at your position)
·
Body—defends the paper’s main
argument by mobilizing the data you
collected (this can take a number of formats, depending on your particular
question/data).
·
Conclusion—wraps up the paper by
recapping the main argument and why it is valid, while perhaps also exploring
some policy recommendations, theoretical or political implications, or
directions for future work that were beyond the scope of the paper
·
Figures—Photographs, tables, graphs, and diagrams.
·
Maps—Often essential to your story.
·
Works Cited
Presentations
These
will be 10 minutes long, with some extra time for questions and comments.
Graphics can be extremely useful for making your argument clear.
Your presentation will be evaluated using the criterion of clarity. How clearly do you present and defend your paper’s main argument?
These are dates to
keep you on track. They are not formal
deadlines, but we encourage you to follow them so that you are not scrambling
to do everything at the end of the quarter.
We guarantee that scrambling will produce inferior papers. We are happy (and it is our job) to give feedback
on any of these steps, either in written form or in person. Our feedback, especially on defining the
research question, will be extremely helpful in helping you write a clear,
focused research paper.
Week 2 Tour Special Collections and Map Room
Week 3 Select research topic and research question
Week 6 Compile complete bibliography
Week 8 Complete rough draft
Week 9 Project Due (this is a formal deadline, see syllabus)
Week 10 Presentations (this is a formal deadline, see syllabus)