Airborne Transmission of MRSA
Scientific studies which showing evidence of MRSA airborne transmission.
1. “Significance of Airborne Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Unit” by Teruo Shiomori, MD, PhD; Hiroshi Miyamoto, MD, PhD; Kazumi Makishima, MD, PhD Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:644-648
In this 2001 study, Japanese doctors
attempted to measure if MRSA could be found in the air of a surgical hospital
ward. The rooms of 3 patients who acquired MRSA after surgery were monitored
with air samplers and surface swabbing.
Results: MRSA was detected in all 3 rooms in the air and on surfaces. 20% of the MRSA particles were within the respirable range, of less than 4 µm.
From this research: “Methicillin-resistant S aureus was recirculated among the patients, the air, and the inanimate environments, especially when there was movement in the rooms. Airborne MRSA may play a role in MRSA colonization in the nasal cavity or in respiratory tract MRSA infections. Measures should be taken to prevent the spread of airborne MRSA to control nosocomial MRSA infection in hospitals.”
2. “Reduction in MRSA
environmental contamination with a portable HEPA-filtration unit”
by TC Boswell & PC Fox Journal of Hospital Infection 2006 May;63(1):47-54
Results: 95% of settle plates placed in the wards showed MRSA contamination. Plates were placed in a variety of locations, mostly along the perimeter of the room. When HEPA filtration was introduced, measurable MRSA decreased between 73%-95%. This study makes a direct link between air and the dispersion of viable MRSA.
From this study: “Although filtering the air in a hospital can not replace standard infection control measures (e.g. isolation, hand hygiene, protective clothing and cleaning), it is likely to reduce cross-infection risks significantly and could provide a relatively cost effective method for enhancing MRSA control.”
3. “The relationship between airborne colonization and nosocomial infections in the intensive care unit”, G Dürmaz, et al Mikrobiyol Bul. October 2005 (article in Turkish)
In 2005 Turkish researchers used
more than 900 data points to measure airborne pathogens and the colonization of
those pathogens in hospital patients. The study tracked 179 patients and found
that MRSA is definitely airborne.
Results: Researchers proved that MRSA was airborne through the use of air samplers. The two most common airborne pathogens were MRSA and Acinetobacter baumannii. Furthermore, the study says there is a link between the concentration of these airborne pathogens and colonization in patients.
From this research: “It can be concluded that, total number of airborne viable particles in the critical areas such as operating theatres and intensive care units, seems to be a significant risk factor for the development of nosocomial infections in immuno-compromised patients.”
4. “An outbreak of Serratia marcescens infection in a special-care baby unit of a community hospital in United Arab Emirates: the importance of the air conditioner duct as a nosocomial reservoir” S. A. Uduman, et al Journal of Hospital Infection (2002) 52: 175-180
A deadly outbreak of S. marcescens vexed the staff members of a NICU located in
Results: Researchers determined that the reservoir of the deadly pathogen was the air conditioning system that fed the NICU. Despite many typical infection control interventions such as staff education, environmental cultures, isolation of colonized patients, compliance with aggressive infection control measures and recognition of the role of cross contamination the colonization of infants grew. When environmental sampling suggested that contamination was emanating from the air conditioning system, the hospital thoroughly sanitized the system. After this measure the 20 week outbreak ended.
From the study: “the growth of serratia from airflow samples suggested that the primary source of this outbreak was the air conditioner duct.” “In conclusion, we have documented in this report the results of extensive surveillance and the importance of the air conditioner duct site as a reservoir of nosocomial pathogens in the SCBU of a community hospital. The possibility of airborne transmission in nosocomial spread should not be underestimated.” Although there is ample evidence that MRSA and other pathogens are transmitted via the air, most infection control measures focus on contact precautions.
5. “Significance of Airborne Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Unit” by Teruo Shiomori, MD, PhD; Hiroshi Miyamoto, MD, PhD; Kazumi Makishima, MD, PhD. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:644-648
This study is from the
6. “The Airborne Transmission of
Infection in Hospital Buildings: Fact or
Fiction” by C.B. Beggs, Indoor and Built Environment,
Vol. 12, No. 1-2, 9-18 (2003)
This research was performed by the
Aerobiological Research Group,
Airborne transmission is known to be the route of infection for diseases such as tuberculosis and aspergillosis. It has also been implicated in nosocomial outbreaks of MRSA, Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Despite this there is much scepticism about the role that airborne transmission plays in nosocomial outbreaks. This paper investigates the airborne spread of infection in hospital buildings, and evaluates the extent to which it is a problem. It is concluded that although contact-spread is the principle route of transmission for most infections, the contribution of airborne micro-organisms to the spread of infection is likely to be greater than is currently recognised. This is partly because many airborne micro-organisms remain viable while being non-culturable, with the result that they are not detected, and also because some infections arising from contact transmission involve the airborne transportation of micro-organisms onto inanimate surfaces.
7. “Role of ventilation in airborne transmission of infectious agents in the built environment – a multidisciplinary systematic review” by Y. Li 1 , G. M. Leung 2 , J. W. Tang 3 , X. Yang 4 , C. Y. H. Chao 5 , J. Z. Lin 6 , J. W. Lu 7 , P. V. Nielsen 8 , J. Niu 9 , H. Qian 1 , A. C. Sleigh 10 , H.-J. J. Su 11 , J. Sundell 12 , T. W. Wong 13 , P. L. Yuen 14 Indoor Air, Vol 17, Issue 1, 2-18 (2007) Departments of 1Mechanical Engineering and 2Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, 3Department of Microbiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, 4Department of Building Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 5Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, 6Division of Building Science and Technology and 7Department of Building and Construction, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 8Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, 9Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China, 10National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 11Medical College, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, 12International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 13Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, 14Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR Government, Hong Kong, China
Abstract There have been few recent studies demonstrating a definitive association between the transmission of airborne infections and the ventilation of buildings. The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic in 2003 and current concerns about the risk of an avian influenza (H5N1) pandemic, have made a review of this area timely. We searched the major literature databases between 1960 and 2005, and then screened titles and abstracts, and finally selected 40 original studies based on a set of criteria. We established a review panel comprising medical and engineering experts in the fields of microbiology, medicine, epidemiology, indoor air quality, building ventilation, etc. Most panel members had experience with research into the 2003 SARS epidemic. The panel systematically assessed 40 original studies through both individual assessment and a 2-day face-to-face consensus meeting. Ten of 40 studies reviewed were considered to be conclusive with regard to the association between building ventilation and the transmission of airborne infection. There is strong and sufficient evidence to demonstrate the association between ventilation, air movements in buildings and the transmission/spread of infectious diseases such as measles, tuberculosis, chickenpox, influenza, smallpox and SARS. There is insufficient data to specify and quantify the minimum ventilation requirements in hospitals, schools, offices, homes and isolation rooms in relation to spread of infectious diseases via the airborne route.
Practical Implication: The strong and sufficient evidence of the association between air ventilation, the control of airflow direction in buildings, and the transmission and spread of infectious diseases supports the use of negatively pressurized isolation rooms for patients with these diseases in hospitals; in addition to the use of other engineering control methods. However, the lack of sufficient data on the specification and quantification of the minimum air ventilation requirements in hospitals, schools and offices in relation to the spread of airborne infectious diseases, suggest the existence of a knowledge gap. Our study reveals a strong need for a multidisciplinary study in investigating disease outbreaks, and the impact of indoor air environments on the spread of airborne infectious diseases.
8. “Air--Treatment Systems for Controlling Hospital-Acquired Infections” by W. Kowalski, PE, PhD. Heating, Piping, and Air Conditioning Engineering, April 2008
The Association for Professionals in Infections Control (APIC)