App Proposal Evaluation Rubric
The following are suggested criteria to consider when
evaluating the presentations. Since most of the criteria are subjective, it is
reasonable for you to apply your own rules (please do share yours if you care).
You are only responsible for entering a number for each category.
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Use of Visual Aid |
High
quality with clear app layout sketch |
Good
quality with app layout sketch |
Quality
is ok, can see some sketch of app layout |
Some
visual aid, difficult to make out what the app will look like |
Bad
visual aid in general |
Explain
how technical requirements are met |
Include
a slide (or two) that explains how the app meets all the technical
requirements |
Include
a slide (or two) that explains how the app meets some of the technical
requirements |
Describe
how the app meets the technical requirements with no visual aid |
Mention
the technical requirements without describing how they are met |
Made
no mention to the specified technical requirements |
Confidence
in meeting deadline |
Very
sure that the team can complete their app as proposed |
Somewhat
sure that the team can complete their app as proposed |
The
team may be able to complete their app as proposed. |
The
demo does not provide confidence that the team can meet the deadline. |
It
is very clear that the team will not be able to meet the demanding deadline. |
Interesting App |
I
will wait in line to use the app |
I
wish the app is here and I can try it out |
If
the app is done, I want to try it. |
I
will try it to be polite. |
I
will be rude and won't even try it. |
Three
person team: without mention texture map and transformed textures will receive
0 from Kelvin