EPI 512 home

Epidemiology 512
Epidemiologic Methods I
Autumn, 2011
Textbook Errata

Page
Printed as:
Should read:
89
P ≈ ID . d
P ≈ IR . d
90
Patient #2's line has no event mark at the end, but patient #3's line does
Patient #2's line should have an event mark at the end, but not patient #3's line
136
...about 69% higher than...
...about 68% higher than...
213
RR = OR = (623/26)/(65/584) = 2.67
RR = OR = (623/26)/(584/65) = 2.67
243
(First row total in table for problem 2.a:) 118
108
85/118 = 0.72
85/108 = 0.79
(Last line on page:) ...was greater than in 1990.
...was greater in 1990.
244
Definitions of exposed and unexposed groups were reversed in parts (b) and (c), compared to part (a).
(Download corrected table)
246
Iowa City, Iowa
Ames, Iowa
261
...adjusted incidence rate ratio (rate ratio)...
...adjusted incidence rate ratio (relative risk)...
262
...and 98,000 women...
...and 90,000 women...
275
(First row of bottom table:) 50-59
50-54
278
120/1,229,000 = 0.0976 per 1000...
120/1,231,000 = 0.0975 per 1000...
1,086,000/1,229,000 = 88.4%
1,086,000/1,231,000 = 88.2%
281
Cummings and Weiss, 1998
Cummings and Koepsell, 1998
315
...treatment for for depression...
...treatment for depression...
340
(First line of 2(c):) ...among placebo recipients...
...among estrogen recipients...
370
...as a bias for...
...as a basis for...
373
Landrigand
Landrigan
375
Possible sources of data an exposure status...
Possible sources of data on exposure status...

Last updated: 12/22/11