8 January
1.Jackson, R. et al. 2001. Water in a changing world. Ecological Applications 11:1027-1045.
2.Forum on Water. 2005 Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment: 3: 503-509
3.Postel, S. 1995. Preface to Last Oasis. WW Norton, New York.
4.Postel, S. 2005. Liquid Assets: Critical Need to Safeguard Freshwater Ecosystems. Worldwatch Paper 170, Washington DC. [This is a longer article; read if you can]
Optional : Alcamo, J., C. Vorosmarty, R. J. Naiman, D. Lettenmaier, and C. Pahl-Wostl. 2008.A grand challenge for freshwater research: Understanding the global water system. Environmental Research Letters 3: 1-6. [Also required for 12 March]

15 January
1.Poff, NL and 7 others. 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience 47:769-784.
2.Naiman et al. 2005. Riparia. Elsevier. Chapter 2
3.*Bisson, PA and RE Bilby. 1998. Organic Matter and Trophic Dynamics. (Chapter 15)
4.Decamps, H., R.J. Naiman, and M.C. McClain. 2009. Riparian zones.Pages 1-8, in G. Likens (Editor in Chief), Encyclopedia of Inland Waters. Elsevier, New York.

22 January
1.*Reid LM. 1998. Cumulative Watershed Effects and Watershed Analysis. Chapter 19.

29 January
1.Ascher, W. 2001. Coping with Complexity and Organizational Interests in Natural Resource Management. Ecosystems 4:742-757.
2.Rogers, K. 2005. The real river management challenge: Integrating scientists, stakeholders and service agencies.River Research and Applications 22:1-12.
3.Yaffee, S.L. 1996. Ecosystem management in practice: The importance of human institutions. Ecological Applications 6(3) 724-727.

5 February
1.    McConnaha, W. et al. 2006. Introduction and Background to the Columbia River Salmon Problem. In R. Williams (ed.), Return to the River. Boston: Elsevier Academic Press.

12 February
1.Ruckelshaus, B. et al. 2008. Puget Sound Partnership Strategic Plan 2009-2011.
2.Ack, B. et al. 2007. State of the Sound. Puget Sound Action Team. Office of the Governor, State of Washington. (SKIM)
3.Iceland, C. et al. 2008. Identifying Important Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Puget Sound. Draft Summary of Interviews and Research for the Puget Sound Partnership. (SKIM)
4.Blockstein, D. 2002. How to lose your political virginity while keeping your scientific credibility. BioScience 52:91-96.

19 February
1.Michael, D.N. 1995. Barriers and bridges to learning in a turbulent human ecology. Pages 461-485, in LH Gunderson, CS Holling, and SS Light (editors), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York.
2.Max-Neef, M.A. 2005. Foundations of transdisciplinarity.Ecological Economics 53:5-16.
3.*Shannon, MA 1998. Social Organizations and Institutions. Chapter 21.

26 February
1.*Masonis and Bodi. 1998. River Law. Chapter 22.

5 March
1.Biggs, H.C. and K.H. Rogers. 2003. An adaptive system to link science, monitoring, and management in practice.Pages 59-80, in JT du Toit, KH Rogers, and HC Biggs (eds), The Kruger Experience: Ecology & Management of Savanna Heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington, DC.
2.Dale, V.H., S. Brown, R. Haeuber, N.T. Hobbs, N. Huntley, R.J. Naiman, W.E. Riebsame, M.G. Turner, and T. Valone. 2000. Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land.Ecological Applications 10:639-670.
3.*von Hagen et al. 1998. Nonprofit Organizations and Watershed Management. Chapter 25

12 March
1.Naiman, RJ and MG Turner. 2000. A future perspective on America's freshwater ecosystems. Ecological Applications 10:958-970.
2.Alcamo, J., C. Vorosmarty, R. J. Naiman, D. Lettenmaier, and C. Pahl-Wostl. 2008.A grand challenge for freshwater research: Understanding the global water system. Environmental Research Letters 3:1-6.

Use the following link to access readings on E-Reserves: https://eres.lib.washington.edu/eres/coursepage.aspx?page=docs&cid=2519