497U Home
Syllabus
Course Links
Week One
Week Two
Week Three
Week Four
Week Five
Week Six
Week Seven
Week Eight
Student Info.
Fish Forum
|
This Week's
Lecture... |
Week 4 - Connections to the Land
Bob Bilby, Tim Beechie
January 27, 1999
Freshwater hydrology - Tim Beechie
Terrestrial Habitat Influences - Bob Bilby
Outline for discussion of physical processes that form salmon
habitat in streams and rivers
Tim Beechie
Skagit System Cooperative
1) Morphology and evolution of salmon habitats post glaciation.
Most river valleys in the Puget Sound basin are filled with sedimentary
deposits dating from >14,000 years B.P. Deposits of till, outwash,
and lacustrine clay indicate a series of advances and retreats
that periodically created ice dams at the mouths of valleys (clays
deposited in lakes created by ice dams, outwash deposited by pro-glacial
rivers, and till under the ice sheet). Since that time, erosion
of these deposits created a valley morphology characterized by
terraces up to elevations of 2000 feet. Radiocarbon dating indicates
that most of the erosion occurred prior to about 8,000 years B.P.
in the S. F. Stillaguamish valley.
Valley morphologies we see today are partly a function of the
underlying bedrock terrain. Where valleys are narrow, most deposits
have been eroded away and terraces are few. In wider valleys,
we see broad terraces (several miles wide many valleys). The resultant
topography influences the distribution of salmonid habitats. In
constrained valleys we find steeper tributaries and narrower flood
plains, which means not much low-gradient stream that provides
habitat for salmon. Where valleys are wider, we tend to see long
reaches of moderate-gradient tributaries cutting through terraces,
and extensive low-gradient channels on flood plains.
2) Habitat losses in the last 150 years.
An assessment of habitat losses over the last 150 years in the
Skagit and Stillaguamish River basins shows that the greatest
overall losses are due to isolation of habitats by levees, channel
alterations, and culverts blockages. Tributary degradation is
most severe in urban areas, with lesser degradation in agricultural
and commercial forest areas. Lower river off channel habitats
(side-channel and distributary sloughs) have been most severely
impacted because they are located in floodplains that have been
claimed for agricultural and urban development.
3) Physical processes that form salmon habitat.
Sediment supply is most significantly affected by changes in mass
wasting rates. Stands less than 20 years old have mass wasting
rates approximately four times that of mature forest areas, and
roads have mass wasting rates approximately 40 times that of mature
forest areas. The cumulative effect in a watershed is to increase
average annual sediment supply under a forest management regime
to about twice that of the natural fire regime. Large increases
in bed load supply fill pools, and changes in fines may reduce
survival of eggs in the gravel. The rate of sediment transport
out of reaches (annual travel distance of bed load) averages about
20 channel widths per year in channels with slope less than 0.03.
In one example (Deer Creek, North Fork Stillaguamish) pool depths
recovered significantly less than 10 years after they were filled
by landslide sediments.
LWD recruitment has been altered by previous logging practices
and conversion to agricultural and urban land uses. Compared to
projected LWD recruitment under the natural fire regime, forest
management typically reduces recruitment of LWD large enough to
form pools by an estimated 35 to 100%. Pool spacing is more sensitive
to LWD loading in channels with slope between 0.02 and 0.05 than
in channels with slope less than 0.02. In low-slope channels,
pool spacing is partly maintained by lateral scour at banks when
LWD is absent. Recovery rate for recruitment of LWD large enough
to form pools is primarily a function of channel size and the
tree species colonizing a disturbed riparian area.
Hydrologic regime is most dramatically affected by land use in
urban areas. Increased impervious area dramatically increases
peak flows. Impervious area <3% has an insignificant effect; impervious
area >10% significantly alters stream morphology and biota. Effects
of forestry activities (roads and timber harvest) on peak flows
are generally restricted to less than bankfull flows. Altered
channel morphology or species assemblages are (so far) difficult
to document. Other affects on hydrology are water withdrawals
and hydroelectric dams.
|