German 390/Comp. Lit. 396/Engl 363/CHID 498
Lecture Notes: Freud, "The Theme of the Three Caskets" (1913)
King Lear: Elder daughters Goneril and Regan flatter their father to prove their love and receive part of his kingdom in return; Cordelia, younger, genuinely good and loving daughter, refuses to flatter and is disowned. Lear's choice leads to his ruin and general decline. Lear presents a kind of counter-example, representing the false, wrong choice.
Myth of Paris: Paris needs to choose the most beautiful from among 3 goddesses; his choice falls upon the third, Aphrodite, the goddess of love. This prefigures Freud's later conclusion that this motif is, on the surface, about the choice of love.
Cinderella: In this fairy tale the youngest daughter, who is constantly punished at home, is the one of three who is preferred by the Prince.
Myth of Psyche: In this myth, Psyche, like Cinderella, is the youngest of 3 sisters of a king. Because her beauty attracts the attention of all humans, the goddess Venus becomes jealous and decides to punish her. But Cupid, Venus's son, falls in love with Psyche and ultimately rescues her.
ñFreud looks for the common denominator in these diverse stories/myths. The fact that in Lear these women are daughters instead of brides is relevant only to Lear's advanced age. Freud's question: What do the chosen women have in common besides beauty, love, etc.?
II. Consequences to be drawn from Freuds procedures for the study of literature:
1) The methods of psychoanalytic clinical practice are applicable to the interpretation of literary and cultural artifacts; we can plug in methodological solutions derived from psychoanalysis in order to find our way out of seeming interpretive dead ends.
2) The structure of literature, myth, fairy talesin fact, of all narrative formsimitates the structure of dreams, of imaginative fantasy. This means: they emerge from the unconscious and are distorted by the same censorship mechanism that produces the dream-work. The operative mechanisms are displacement, condensation, substitution, wish-fulfillment, etc.
3) The obvious significance of a literary text or of elements in a text is not necessarily the most important or the most profound significance. Freud teaches us to dig deeper and seek a latent significance that underlies the manifest meaning of the text. Metaphor of archaeology, of digging down below the surface to uncover the remnants of the more authentic, unconscious message.
4) We can fruitfully go outside the text itself for help comprehending it: myth, fairy tales, other literary texts, psychoanalytical insights, etc., etc. The only requirement is that these outside resources share a structure, theme, or other similarity with the text under examination.
5) Texts are transformations of other texts insofar as they all derive from the same source, from the human psyche and its dialectical structure. Here we find the theoretical roots of transformational structuralism, the belief that literary texts are modifications of a simple set of paradigmatic narratives, thematic clusters, etc. (See Writings on Art and Literature 119-120).
6) The effectiveness of literature, its receptive impact, is not tied solely to aesthetic form, identification with characters, themes, etc. (as Freud suggested in "Creative Writers and Day-Dreaming"), but also results from its cathartic, therapeutic dimension. Literature undoes repression, helps reveal and uncover the hidden, unconscious truth behind the textual faÁade (here: the truth of death), and hence brings us psychic relief and pleasure.
Last Updated: 1/20/06