HIST112W           FIRST PAPER: SUGGESTED TOPICS AND INSTRUCTIONS 

Due Date:   JANUARY 28 MONDAY of WEEK 4, hand in at lecture to TA

Paper Format:  typed, double spaced, 3-5 pages, (20% of grade)
            plus separate title page with name, date, title of paper, etc
            NO PLASTIC OR CARDBOARD COVERS, PLEASE

Late policy:   Late papers will be graded down -.1 per day overdue (weekend -.2).

Drafts:    
Since this is a W course, you will have the opportunity to submit a rough draft to your section leader;
TA’s will set their own deadline for accepting and returning drafts.  Please note that 1) drafts will be
commented on but not graded, and 2) submission of drafts is encouraged but not required.  If you need help,
you may consult with your section leader during office hours, or arrange an individual appointment to discuss
your paper.  You can make an appointment with  History Department Writing Lab, located in Smith 210,
where History graduate student tutors who are available to help with papers.  Information by and about the Writing
Lab is included with syllabus.  Phone 543-5692  E-mail: hwc@u.washington.edu

Topics: Choose one of the following topics, which draw on primary readings assigned in the first section of the course
from Geary, Readings on Medieval History.  In each case, begin by carefully re-reading the texts, looking for specific
pieces of evidence, and building up an interpretation of the document, either in relation to another historical document
or to its historical context.

1.    What image of German society is presented in Tacitus' Germania (Geary, p. 69-82), and what is Tacitus' purpose in
writing an ethnographic account of these non-Roman, northern people?

2.    Tacitus' Germania (Geary, p. 69-82) gives a Roman outsider's view of the northern "barbarians," while Bede's History of
the English Church and People
(Geary, p. 224-236) is written by an English Christian describing the conversion of his own people. 
How do their different religious and cultural perspectives influence their historical analyses of the societies they are studying?

3.    During the early middle ages, monasticism emerged as the "narrow path" -- the most rigorous, but also the most certain --
means of achieving salvation.  Using the Rule of St. Benedict (Geary, pp. 168-198) and the “Life and Miracles of St. Benedict"
from the Dialogues of  Gregory the Great (Geary, pp. 199-220), discuss the image of holiness represented by St. Benedict, and
how the monastic life helps in overcoming obstacles to salvation.  (Depending on your approach, you are free to concentrate more
on the Rule or the Dialogues.)

4.  What image of kingship is presented in Einhard's Life of Charlemagne?  (Geary, p. 282-296) What are the qualities that, in the
author's view, made Charlemagne a great ruler?

5.  Drawing on the Carolingian Capitularies (Geary, pp. 297-320), discuss the extent and limits of governmental authority under
Charlemagne.  What did the government attempt to do?  What kinds of issues were included in his legislative and judicial decrees?

6.  Compare the image of kingship presented in Einhard's Life of Charlemagne (Geary, p. 282-296) with the actual exercise of
governmental authority reflected in the Capitularies (Geary, pp. 297-320). 

**************************************************************************************************************************************

COMMENTS ON WRITING A HISTORY ESSAY FROM PRIMARY DOCUMENTS     HIST112

Many of you have your own tried and tested ways of writing papers, but many students have questions about the process of
organizing and writing a history essay, especially how to formulate a thesis statement.  What follows are my own suggestions,
which are certainly not the only or the required way to proceed. 
A major point I want to emphasize is that, when you begin
working on your essay, you will not yet have a thesis statement (in most cases).  You need to find a thesis, or an issue about
which you can make an argument in the process of working on the material.  So, if you feel unsure about how  to get from a
document to a paper, let me make the following suggestions. 

GENERAL PROCEDURE:   After choosing a topic, reread sections of the text book that are relevant; also review lecture notes if
applicable.  This is part of placing the topic or question in its historical context, which is a crucial part of history papers.  "Context"
does not mean giving a synopsis of all of medieval history in one paragraph, but rather indicating how specific movements or events
(rise of monasticism, fall of the Roman Empire etc.) influenced your topic.

Gathering material:
Re-read the documents on which your essay will draw.
            Look for themes, issues, examples that relate to your topic.
            Keep a list of these as you read.

Take notes on each theme or issue, using separate pages or index cards for each theme.
Include brief quotes, summary or statement, specific examples, plus page # to refer back.

Think about how the themes, issues &/or examples are connected.  Try to formulate a series of questions, problems, that help you to 
think about the material. you have pulled together in notes.

Make an outline.  In the best possible scenario your notes may start to take shape on their
    own, as connections in the material may suggest themselves to you. At times they have
    been known to go so far as "jumping off the page" at an author, but this cannot be guaranteed. 
    If your themes do not "fall into place" on their own, then you need to take  charge and impose 
    your own interpretative scheme or argument       on the evidence you are dealing with. 

Arrange themes, issues, material in a logical order, one that develops from
point A to point B in a coherent manner.  Once you find a "logical order"
(and remember, there are always many more than one logical orders that can
be imposed on, or seen in, any group of documentary materials) you are close
to being ready to "say something" about the material, that is ready to:

Formulate a thesis statement, at least a tentative one; it can be worked on, revised, refined etc in the course of writing your paper.
Generally, this statement is presented in the first paragraph, but usually that first paragraph is written (or rather re-written) last,
as your ideas evolve. 

Write a draft of the paper, beginning with your tentative thesis statement and following the outline that you made above .  (Everything
can be changed as you go along, of course.)  Conclusion should re-present the thesis statement in somewhat (but not too) different.

Reread and edit your own paper for grammar, wording, syntax, sentence structure, etc.  Notice how evidence, central argument,
examples and/or thesis are presented, whether the essay reads smoothly and well.  Pay attention to word choice, repetitious phrasing,
agreement
of tense (past vs present), number (singular vs plural). 

REMEMBER: ALL GOOD WRITING IS REWRITING. 

Recommended for purchase: 
Struck and White, Elements of Style: good, SHORT and very helpful little book on
                                                           how to write more effectively, clearly and tersely.

***********************************************************************************************************

HIST112     INSTRUCTIONS ON PAPERS: FORMAT FOR CITATIONS         

GENERAL FORMAT: Papers should be typed, double spaced; no plastic or cardboard covers, just a title page
with your name, paper title, date, course, section, and TA’s name.

The basic purpose of scholarly citations is that any reader should be able to track down your sources for direct
quotes and for ideas or information taken from a specific source.  Professors & TAs know what books you are using,
but complete citations are required for each primary source.  The general rule about citations is to follow a consistent format,
including all relevant publication information.  You may follow any consistent format (historians use Turabian's University of
Chicago Manual of Style
, but other systems are also fine).

Endnotes and footnotes differ only in where they are located; footnotes are at the foot of the page, while endnotes are at the
end of the paper.  Either is fine, though endnotes are generally easier, unless your computer program makes footnotes just
as easy.  Also, note that endnotes do not need to be on a separate page, so long as there is still room on your last page. 

For this course, we are suggesting the following simplified format, where a complete citation is first given in a note, and later
citations are indicated by page numbers in parentheses.

For the first citation of a work, give the complete reference, either in a footnote (bottom of page)
or an endnote (at end of paper), using a numbered note1, as follows:

1  Cornelius Tacitus, Germania, in Patrick Geary (ed.), Readings in Medieval History 3rd ed. (2003), pp. 69-82.  Subsequent
citations to this work will be indicated in parenthesis in the text.

If your essay draws on only one primary source, you can simply indicate page numbers in parenthesesafter quotes or other citations, as follows: (p. 70)

If your essay draws on two or more sources, you must give a full citation (like the one given above) the first time you cite a given source, as follows: 

2     Einhard, Life of Charlemagne, in Patrick Geary (ed.), Readings in Medieval History 3rd ed. (2003), pp. 282-296.

3     Bede, History of the English Church and People, in Patrick Geary (ed.), Readings in Medieval History (1997), pp. xxx.

When there is more than one source, you should use the author or editor's last name, or a short version of the author or title (for instance,
Tacitus, Einhard, Bede, Gregory of Tours, or Capitularies) to indicate which of two or more sources you are citing, as follows: 

Second and subsequent references to note #1 above if using more than one source:
  (Tacitus, p. 70)        or    (Geary, p. 70). 
versus
Second and subsequent references to note #2, above:
  (Einhard, p. 270)       or    (Geary, p. 270) 

DO'S AND DON'TS (Liz Johnson, TA)
DO
Italicize or underline book titles, including abbreviated titles.
Put quotes that are four lines or longer in block quote format (no quotation marks if blocked)
     (single space the quote and indent both sides OR single space and use smaller font size)
Cite your sources, using footnotes/endnotes &/or parenthetical citations
     [(title of book, pg #) or (name of author, pg #)]    SEE ABOVE
Use first person plural (we) or third person (he/she/one).

Don't
use contractions (don't, won't, would've, it's, he's, etc.)
use its'-no apostrophe on "its" when used as a possessive
      it's = it is     its = possessive     [its' doesn't exist]
use second person (you) or first person singular (I)
split infinitive verb forms-ex. "to quickly go" should be "to go quickly"