Wk VII Section on Thomas More’s Utopia
We are reading this early,
so that people can choose to write a second paper on it.
Sixteenth century England will turn up in lecture in a few weeks, but More's
Utopia
can be read on its own, as a Christian humanist treatise about society. The
basic
questions are: what makes a good society (Bk 2, Utopia) and what makes for a
poverty ridden, violent and hierarchical society (Bk 1, England).
Career of Thomas More (1478-1535)
1490’s study at Oxford:
pious layman, active life
1500 meets Erasmus, studies Greek
1504 elected to Parliament: Speaker of House of Commons
1509 Henry VIII becomes King
1515-27 diplomatic missions to continent
1523 knighted (Sir Thomas More), Treasurer of Exchequer
1529 becomes Lord Chancellor (after fall of Wolsey)
1532 resigns over Henry’s rejection of Papal supremacy
1533 Anne Boleyn crowned Queen, Elizabeth born
1534 Act of Supremacy: Henry as head of English Church;
requires loyalty oath from all officials
1535 Thomas More executed for refusal of oath
Utopia: written
1515-16 ( Title means “Nowhere” in Greek)
Christian humanist commentary on society and politics
reflects central issues of his career & of 16th C. England
Bk I. Dialogue on Counsel,
or Advice to Princes
Influence of travel literature:
Raphael Hythloday (= “Nonsense” in Greek)
Issues:
1) can a wise man influence ruler? or, how to
serve in government without compromising integrity;
prophetic of More’s own fate
2) social causes of crime:
private property, enclosures, war, retainers,
What picture of 16th C. English society is drawn here?
How was Utopia
started?
How does it stay separate from world?
What concept of human nature is present in Utopian society?
Are men naturally good or bad?
What makes Utopians good?
Compare them to the non-Utopians described.
What are their attitudes to:
property, work, family, sex,
money,
morality, religion, warfare, politics, lawmaking
Is there anything specifically Christian about Utopia?
General questions:
What makes this a "Christian humanist"
work?
To what extent do the reforms laid out in Book II address the problems
of 16th C. England described in Book I?