HSTEU305 SECOND PAPERS:                 DUE DATE:  Monday August 17

Papers should be 5-6 pages typed, double spaced, no covers please, just title page with
name, date, title.

TOPICS TO BE PICKED by August 3:  e-mail Professor O’Neil or turn in index card

To be sure everyone has decided on a topic a week or more before paper is due, topics will be due 8/3,
turned in on index card at lecture. Topics not on this list should be discussed with by Prof O’Neil.

I am glad to discuss topics or look at drafts of your papers.  Talk to me in class, come to office hours,
Tues 9:30-10:30, Thurs 12-1, Fri 10:30-12, or arrange appt by e-mail. 

Malleus Maleficarum:

1. What is the view of women presented by Kramer and Sprenger? What is their overall argument, and
    what are their sources? Issues to be discussed include their view of the general nature of women, their
    sexuality (including demonic sex) and the kinds of harm women are given to. (If you choose this topic, try
    to present these views on their own terms, looking for their internal logic.)

2.  Despite their assurance that witches cannot injure "those who administer public justice against them,"
    the authors of the Malleus betray a certain fear and horror of witches that emerges especially in their
    instructions on how to try a witch (Pt. III, K&P, pp. 204-229).  Discuss the interaction between judges and
    witches and the attitude of the witch hunters towards their victims in the Malleus.

Christopher Marlowe, Doctor Fautus:

3. Marlowe's Doctor Faustus is often described as a Reformation drama. What are the theological issues
    involved in the tragedy of Dr. Faustus? Why is Faust damned? What caused his fall? Could he have been
    saved?     Discuss the attitude to scholasticism and to Catholicism depicted in the play.

16th Century Witch Debate:

4. At the start of the witch panic, the central issues involved were debated by a groups of intellectuals representing
the major professions. What were the issues debated between the Lutheran preacher Johann Brenz, the physician
Johann Weyer, and the French magistrate Jean BodinDiscuss their explanations for the harm attributed to witches
and their positions on the reality of witches, using the documents in the xerox readings packet (Section # 1,  Readings for Week 6).

The Benandanti:
        

5. How does the Inquisition's view of the benandanti differ from their concept of themselves?
Use the trial records included in the Xerox packet  to discuss these differences (trials against Paolo Gasparutto and Battista Moduco). 
You will also need to look at the opening section of Ginzburgs book  The Night Battles,
which you can get on reserve, or borrow a copy from me.

There are at least two distinct cultural levels visible in these trial records, the benandanti and the Inquisition.
Discuss the difference between each of these perspectives, asking:
     1) what is the benandanti's view of themselves and their own social role?
     2) what is the Inquisitor's interpretation of them and their activities?
          (see the sentences handed down at end of trial, as well as questions during trial)

Book report on Salem Possessed

6. Discuss the central argument and methodology of Boyer and Nissenbaum in their book Salem Possessed.
      Why do the authors focus on the period leading up to the witch trials more than on the trials themselves?
      What do they see as the underlying causes of the Salem witchcraft accusations?

 

 More paper topics:

PAPERS ANALYZING WITCH TRIAL DOCUMENTS                             

These topics involve close reading and analysis of one or more trial records, placing them in their historical context by
using secondary source These papers should will take the transcripts of one or more witch trials, and place the trials in
 their specific historical context.  Trial documents can be analyzed in various ways:

1) Factual / literal / historical reading of trial records:
Reconstruct the events leading to trial from a close reading of the trial document.
What happened before the trial? How did accusation(s) come about?
Who is testifying against the accused?  What happens after person is arrested?
Use small bits of information in the trial records as evidence, clues.

2) Social/cultural/symbolic reading:   What images of witch, devil, familiars etc are invoked in trial?
What is the social context of the accused witch's life?   Is s/he accused by neighbors, relatives, strangers?
Can you identify the accused witch's social role (e.g. beggar, healer, midwife etc.)?
What social purposes might be served by this trial?

Analyses of trial records should begin with a close reading of the trial itself,
including specific details  (
but not all details will be easily interpreted..)

Papers drawing on trial documents should then place a specific trial in its
historical context (country, date, type of court, religion etc.)
 
How does this trial record reflect local traditions, beliefs, legal procedures? 
You should examine specific charges brought, how an initial accusation came before the court,
the kind of court trying the case (if secular jurisdiction: local or higher appeals court?; if a Catholic
court: Inquisition or Bishop’s court?; most trials outside of Italy & Spain occur in secular courts).
Note also the kinds of questions put to defendant & to witnesses, form of judicial procedure used,
the types of evidence accepted by the court, the standards of proof in use, and the outcome of the case. 
What is interesting, surprising or unique about this case?  How does it compare to trials elsewhere?

To place trials in their context, you need some secondary sources.  What follows is a list of
trials and relevant sources for context. A recent new Encyclopedia of Witchcraft (2006). edited
by Richard Golden
is availalbe in Suzzallo Reference Section BF1566 .E56 2006 v.1 -4 for
Library Use Only (LUO) You could use the articles on England or German as background.

1) Italy: Trial of the Benandanti  in Appendix of Carlo Ginzburg, The Night Battles  pp. 147-171  
Use his discussion of the trials for context, especially pp 1-39, 69-97.

2)  Netherlands/France: Trial of Suzanne Gaudry in Kors & Peters  # 57 pp. 359-366. 
For context, see article by Robert Muchembled, “Witches of the Cambresis,” will be on E-reserve.

3)  Chelmsford WitchesThe first set of Chelmsford trials are included in Kors & Peters #46,
pp. 302-208; later outbreaks are also documented in Barbara Rosen (ed) W/C in England.
For context on English trials and Chelmsford, see Levack on England.  Other sources:
Sharpe, Instruments of Darkness;  Keith Thomas, Religion & Decline of Magic, Ch. 14-17. 

4) German trials:  In our reading there are several documents from German cities that can form the
basis for a paper about the German witch panic.  Specific documents include:
Walpurga Hausmanin, in Xerox Packet #3; trial of Johannes Junius in Bamberg 1628, K& P, # 53  pp. 348-353 ; 
moving statement by Frederich Von Spee, Jesuit confessor to witches in Wurzburg, in K&P  # 65 pp. 425-429. 
For overall context use Midelfort article in Xerox packet, Levack & lecture notes.

5)  Salem:  Context is provided by Boyer & Nissenbaum, Salem Possessed (on which you can also write a book report
by itself).  If you want to analyze trial records, there are five included in the book by David Dallin (alias David Levin),
What
Happened at Salem?  (multiple copies in library, Prof. O’Neil also has copies of this book). Complete transcripts of
Salem
trials and related documents are  on line at: http://etext.virginia.edu/salem/witchcraft/texts/
This is an outstanding site, but there are others as well (Google for Salem trial transcripts).

I’d suggest picking one or two trials, perhaps comparing a man and a woman (men: John Proctor, George Burroughs;
women: Sarah Good is a classic, but see also Bridge Bishop and others).  Or compare a “respectable” person like
Rebecca Nurse with a “beggar witch” like Sarah Good.