Figure 3.4 |
3.1 Collage StructuresThe range in scale from collages with two or three fragments to those with over one hundred is extreme; physically, the smaller ones may be 6 by 8 inches (or even smaller--"postcards") and the larger ones 40 by 50 inches. However, as commonly reproduced on the Web, the big ones with one hundred-plus items are often not much larger than the little ones. The reduction of the large ones is so great that they are very hard to see with any detail, and I will not say much about them here, even though some are very interesting. In many ways, the Dadaist Hannah Höch's portrait of Weimer Germany circa 1920 ("Slice with a kitchen knife through the beer belly of the recent Weimar epoch") is the Mother of all Collages. It is a very comprehensive gathering of snippets of the post War, Weimar cultural epoch in Berlin and they are displayed with great ingenuity in frame a little less than a meter by a little more than one (90 by 114 cm.) It is almost obligatorily cited by authors writing about photomontage, collage, or Dada. As a 200 pixel wide thumbnail, it simply cannot be viewed. I forego a sample of the Grandmother of all Collages, Hans Christian Andersen's Great Screen, which "did" the Victorian Era in four six foot high panels. (see e.g. Diane Waldman, Collage, Assemblage, and the Found Object.) These days fullscale resistance is being waged in Kiwiland by Peter Lewis. |
Figure 3.5 |
Other considerations besides sheer density of fragments can impede seeing a large collage. When the fragments mix up the scales, points of view, and orientations of the fragments, we cannot take a single viewpoint for very long. The effect is of having to imaginatively reposition ourselves piece by piece. The image may seem very energetic (it used to be considered ideal for depicting urban life), or it seem unsettlingly agitated. In any case, we look for ways to break a large collage into sectors and we look for focal elements to organize what may otherwise seem as random scanning. So in the medium-sized image by Corey Eiseman linked to Figure 3.5, the vertical strips divide the piece into a triptych and we welcome the fact that the two central images that are rotated 90 degrees to the left are stacked one on top of the other. Eiseman's "Dance of the Penguins" contains thirteen rather large collages, but they are so well organized with directionalities, foreground and focal objects that they do not seem hard to see. |
Figure 3.7 |
Center and margin is a basic structural pattern across time and cultures. Kress and van Leeuwen offer some illustrations and speculations about it and its filiations (to Byzantine religious art, to Confucianism) and there are probably a number of connections one might make. One that comes to mind with some smaller scale collages is the tradition of the emblem book, especially because it mixes words and an image. Figure 3.7 is a page from a certain H. G.'s The mirrour of maiestie, or, The badges of honour conceitedly emblazoned(1621) and has very literally a margin of text surrounding the image. We may think of the printing press mainly in terms of moveable type and the dissemination of text, but a very early and lastingly popular use of the press was to print books of emblems—drawings, often somewhat enigmatic, which were accompanied by a title and some verses in Latin and perhaps also a vernacular language, making them suitable for instruction in language as well as wisdom and sound morality. These were immensely popular for centuries. They carried on the marriage of image and wise lessons from the medieval manuscript beastiaries. The footnote lists a number of scholarly digitizing projects and on-line editions take you of some of the most popular ones. 3 The image of Figure 3.7 (Emblem 30) is, typically, somewhat enigmatic (that is the "conceited" part), and the Latin motto (inscriptio) and vernacular gloss (subscriptio), usually in verse, give pointers for interpreting the image which eventually can be seen as an illustration of the motto, or, the motto as glossed by the appended text. James Elkins speaks of the emblem artists cultivation of the "interesting possibilities afforded by dividing a viewer's attention, shuttling it between text and image, and suspending it in a state of deliberate partial mystification" (Domain, 197). His sense of the emblematic mode is I believe exactly right and this chapter very much worth reading. If anyone lacks examples, let them look on the back of a US one dollar bill. |
Figure 3.9 |
Kress and van Leeuwen say that with center and margins, the center represents the "nucleus of information on which all the other elements are in some sense subservient" (p. 206) With the collages online that I have been collecting, the center can function as a contrast to the margins ("in a world like that, what about this?) This is a strong structural principle for the Japanese collagist Natsuke Kimura. In Figure 3.19, the central image of William Morris, who had famously strong ideas about interior design, and the modern apartment margin are again in a relation of high contrast. Many of Kimura's compositions involve two contrasting things. This may be a result of a deep biculturalism, even though the contrasts are often within one culture. |
|
connect the parts: This structural type is rather sparing of components and not organized with a center. Rather, the implication is that all the parts are connected and it is up to the viewer to see how, though a portentious title usually gets one started on the way. This could be said as well of many Surrealist paintings (e. g., Magritte's), and especially it could be said of those where the components are simply placed and do not overlap or collide with each other. With collage, however, the placement of these oddly sorted objects within a single commonsense realistic world is disrupted by the cutting of the images from different visual worlds and displaying them in an abstract space. |
Figure 3.16 |
In the 1980's, Seán Hillen was an Irish art student from Newry, a town just north of the Irish border and very much in the center of "The Troubles." He photographed many scenes of occupation and strife, and began to elaborate the photographs with bits of others, gradually adopting collage of photos (with scalpel and paste) as his medium. He has on display on the web 39 of these, which were exhibited in smaller groups, but have in common his technique of juxtaposition of war-zone documentary (mostly black and white) with touristy images, figures from TV and comic books, religious images and astronauts (mainly Yuri Gagarin). Hillen does not expect these fragments of worlds, topical as they are, to identify themselves; rather, he provides a paragraph or two of explanation for each image, which explanation is crucial to grasping the "dialectic and political satire" that he acknowledges became their informing purpose. He hopes for a resonance in these works which goes beyond political satire (in the sense of summoning a pious outrage or contempt). They are nonetheless made up of only a few sharply contrasted pieces pasted together to suggest a single space. In Figure 3.16, there are only three segments. The St. Pauls -Newry street opposition needs no comment, but the anatomized corpse figure illustrating wounds, which appears a second pedestrian, is a bit phantasmagorial since it doesn't appear to touch ground (the black stain beneath it being a plausible "shadow"). It saves the image from being simply a sardonic pointer to British hypocrisy. Similar effects are obtained in other collages in the series, as for example in "Who is My Enemy?" (click the " up" arrow and then scroll to the bottom right of the display). This piece juxtaposes an ordinary street scene with the image of a sentry guard-house found out along the road to the city, creating an extraordinary image of life under occupation. Again, the third figure added--that of the movie-poster bad guy pointing a gun at us--displaces us from a polemical stance, pointing perhaps to a culture of violence in which we are all implicated rather than resting in a denunciation of the British occupiers. Like Victor Burgin and Geoff Broadway, Hillen makes these images to "show the contradictions" between oppressor and oppressed. Unlike them, he does not use language to put voices in opposition to images; his main means for showing the contradictions is the cut, the edge of juxtaposition, that seems to lie at the very heart of collage. The contradictions are certainly present even in Hannah Höch's "Schnitt" with which we began the section. What keeps us from calling the "Schnitt" polemical is its love of energetic, playful absurdity and whimsy, and indeed there is a streak of whimsy in Hillen's various apparitions in the midst of these highly contested spaces. |