INFO 300
|
Date
Assigned |
Topic
Due |
Date Due |
|
---|---|---|---|
Project 1 |
Oct. 29 |
N/A |
Nov. 12 |
Project 2 |
Nov. 12 |
N/A |
Nov. 26 |
Project 3 |
Oct. 29 |
Nov. 26 |
Dec. 10 |
PROJECT 1: A
Christmas Carol
– User categorization of works
Do people really
categorize the same material in the same set of systematized ways? Allyson Carlyle’s research -- in which she asked individuals
to sort documents related to the Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol
-- suggests this is the case. This project will give
you the opportunity to collect some of your own empirical data and to test
out Carlyle’s results. In brief, you will replicate
Carlyle’s study and compare your results with hers.
1. Read Allyson
Carlyle’s article on user categorization of works (ref. below). As you read, think about how you would collect and analyze
comparable data -- what you would say, what you would record, and how you
would analyze your results.
Carlyle, A. (1999). User categorization of works:
Toward improved organization of online catalogue displays.
Journal of Documentation, 55(2), 184-208.
2. On Thursday,
Oct. 31, Allyson Carlyle will be giving a giving a guest lecture in our class. During this lecture she will
discuss her research methods and her results.
This will be a great opportunity to ask what her exactly she
did, how it worked, and so forth.
3. When you’re
ready to collect your own data, borrow a photocopy of the stimuli Carlyle
used from Dowell at the Student Services reception desk (MGH 450). This is a hefty set of materials. Dowell
will have a “check-out” system in place. It’s fine
to borrow the materials for an afternoon or over night, but please try not
to hang on to them for too long and be sure to specify when you will return
them so that others can plan to use them as well.
4. Administer the
task yourself to two individuals. Be sure to follow
the same methods that Carlyle did (e.g., what you tell participants about
the task, give them the materials to sort, have the participants write down
a name and description of each category, and so forth). You
may also wish to note any interesting behaviors your participants engage
in (e.g., first creating two categories and them sub-dividing them; first
creating a set of categories on one set of criteria and then abandoning them,
etc.). Note: Based on past experience, I recommend
that you don’t ask family members to participate in the study. Sometimes, given family dynamics, family members may provide
more of a challenge when it comes to following the methods of the study.
5. Describe and
characterize the results from your two participants. Report
the results from your two participants (e.g., what categories did they come
up with, what attributes of the items defined those categories, what items
went into each category). A table or two may be a
useful way to convey some of this data. Also, please
include a copy of the raw data in an appendix. Discuss
how you would characterize their categories (e.g., a participant who had
a category labeled “movies” could be characterized as categorizing based
on the attribute “media”). Note: When you do this
analysis, try to forget that you’ve ever read Carlyle’s work or have any
idea what categories she came up with – you want categories that really represent
your two participants.
6. Then compare your results with those of Carlyle, paying particular attention to the types of attributes that your participants used to categorize the items. Explain how you mapped your participants’ categories onto those of Carlyle. Did your participants rely on any attributes that cannot be accounted for by the categories described by Carlyle? If so, what new categories would you add to Carlyle’s set? Were there some categories of attributes that Carlyle found which your participants’ did not use? Or did not use as frequently? If so, what explanations could you suggest for these differences. Overall, how well do your data support Carlyle’s findings? One way to think about this question is: If an information system was built based on Carlyle’s findings (i.e., the categories she reports), how well could your participants use this system?
This project falls
into the category of empirical research. As such,
I would like you to write up the project in the tone and style of academic
research (along the lines of Carlyle’s article). (Note:
Project 2 will be a design project and in that case I’ll ask you to write
up your project in the tone and style appropriate for a project manager in
an industry setting.) With that in mind, write a 4-5
page paper that (a) introduces the importance of this type of investigation
(you may want to draw on some of the articles we’ve discussed in class to
motivate this investigation) (i.e., introduction), (b) describes what
you did (i.e., methods), (c) reports the results from your two participants
(i.e., results), (d) discusses how you characterized the data from
your two participants, (e) compares your results with those of Carlyle,
(f) draws any general conclusions that you think are appropriate (i.e.,
conclusion), (g) lists any works cited in the paper (i.e., references),
and (h) in an appendix, includes a copy of your raw data (e.g., appendices).
If you work in
a group, you must send me an email no later than Tuesday, November
5 stating that you will be working in a group and listing your group members. If you choose to do this project as a group, each person
in the group should collect data from two individuals. Then
have the group pool the results. Your write up should
incorporate the data from all of the individuals.
A single write-up for the group should be turned in.
SCRIPT TO READ TO STUDY PARTICIPANTS
********* TO BEGIN **************************
Here are photocopies of items
that are related to A Christmas Carol, by Charles Dickens. Please look at each copy carefully and put the copies
into groups based on how alike the items are to each other. That is, things that are similar should go into the same
group. Each group may be as large or as small as you
want it to be.
The purpose of the groups is
to help you find the items later; so, the characteristics you use to create
the groups should help you remember how to find the items at a later time.
When you are finished, I'm
going to ask you to write down the name of each group and a brief description
of it that includes the characteristics that you thought were similar for
that group.
If
you have any questions, feel free to ask at any time.
Please
start your grouping.
********* SUBJECTS COMPLETE GROUPING
TASK **************************
Here is the form for you to
write down your group names and descriptions. Again,
please give each group a name or a label describing that group, and then
write a brief description of that group that includes the characteristics
that are similar about those items. The group name and the description can
be the same, if you want.
Don't worry about the "Letter
of items..." section; I'll fill that out.
GROUP NAME:
GROUP
DESCRIPTION:
GROUP NAME:
GROUP
DESCRIPTION:
GROUP NAME:
GROUP
DESCRIPTION:
GROUP NAME:
GROUP DESCRIPTION: