| Assignment | Date Due | Points |
Public Health Nutrition Program
|
February 24, 26 & March 3 | 40 |
Class preparations & participationDiscussion Worksheets (4 @ 12 points each)
|
60 | |
Science to Policy Paper
|
March 12 |
60 |
Assessing School District Wellness Policies in King County Project |
March 17 |
200
|
| Total | 360 |
- Why is there a need for the program? Describe the conditions that lead to the initiation of the program. For programs that serve people, include information about numbers of people affected by problems the program addresses, potential adverse outcomes the program is designed to prevent, etc.
- What are the mission, goals, and objectives of the program?
- What might a logic model for this program look like?
- If this is a program that provides services, who is served by the program? What are the criteria for receiving services? How many are served by the program at the local, state, and national level?
- Who advocates for this program?
- Who are the stakeholders?
- Describe any opposition to this program or criticism of this program.
- What are the legislative/regulatory and/or non-profit structure and history of the program? Are there proposed changes in regulations?
- How is the program funded? Is current funding adequate to meet needs? Are there proposed changes in funding?
- If this program includes services other than nutrition, how is nutrition integrated into the larger program?
- What role do nutrition professionals play in this program?
- How is the program marketed to potential clients, the community, legislators?
- Has the program been evaluated? What performance measures or outcome measures where used? Was the program found to be effective?
- How does one contact the program to receive services, join the coalition, participate in advocacy efforts?
- What opportunities does this program offer for UW students for concurrent fieldwork placements, practicum experiences, and thesis research?
| Points | |
| Addresses all the points listed above | 25 |
| Critical Thinking: Demonstrates clear understanding of the program & ability to analyze& synthesize information from several sources | 5 |
| Clarity and organization of the class presentation | 5 |
| Clarity and organization of the handout | 5 |
| Total | 40 |
|
Week 1 - 5 |
|
|
Week 6
|
|
|
Week 7-10 |
|
|
Week 10 |
|
|
|
Points |
|
Science to Policy Paper |
|
|
Concise and comprehensive presentation of current state of basic science |
10 |
|
Review of existing recommendations & guidelines |
10 |
|
Policy options & analysis |
10 |
|
Strength and organization of arguments made for chosen proposed policy change (s) |
10 |
|
Organization of paper, flow, introduction & conclusions |
5 |
|
Quality of references |
5 |
| Briefing Paper | |
|
Readability & ease of comprehension of short policy brief |
5 |
|
Selection of information to include in policy brief |
5 |
|
Total points |
60 |