531 Class Assignments

 

Assignment Date Due Points

Public Health Nutrition Program

Student Sign Up Sheet

 

February 24, 26 & March 3 40

Class preparations & participation

Discussion Worksheets (4 @ 12 points each)

Active participation in class exercises, questions asked of guest speakers, contributions to class learning (12 points)

 

  60

Science to Policy Paper

Student Sign Up Sheet

 

March 12

60

Assessing School District Wellness Policies in King County Project

March 17

 

200

 

Total   360

 

Public Health Nutrition Program

Objectives:

  1. Students will be able to analyze public health nutrition programs through the framework provided by course objectives.
  2. Students will be able to organize and synthesize information from several sources into a concise document and presentation.
  3. Students will be able to utilize public health nutrition resources for individuals and populations in their work.

Process:

  1. Students will sign up for a public health nutrition program on the first day of class.
  2. Students will gather the following information from legislation, published evaluations, materials provided by the programs, peer reviewed literature, key informants, commentaries and critiques
  1. Students will make a 10 minute presentation to the class that covers the points listed above and will prepare a two page hand-out to distribute to the class.

Evaluation

  Points
Addresses all the points listed above 25
Critical Thinking: Demonstrates clear understanding of the program & ability to analyze& synthesize information from several sources 5
Clarity and organization of the class presentation 5
Clarity and organization of the handout 5
Total 40

 

 

 

Science to Policy Paper

Objectives

Nutritional Sciences to Policy Framework

Science to Policy Paper Process

Process

  1. Choose a nutrition topic that is the subject of active research and policy deliberations.
  2. Describe the state of the science about this topic including recent peer-reviewed meta-analysis, well done reviews, any rigorous clinical trials with adequate power and designs, etc.  Describe the current state of this evidence and outline any limitations of current knowledge.  Provide a short summary that can be understood by a well informed adult who is not a nutrition scientist.
  3. Discuss clinical or population-based applications of the basic science.  Support this discussion with research, guidelines or recommendations that have been based on evidence about this nutritional issue.
  4. Discuss policy implications of the science about this topic.  Are there existing policies in the US?  In other countries?  What is the impact of existing policies?  What additional research is needed to support policy change? 
  5. Recommend at least one policy change.  Who would support this change?  Who might oppose this change?  What steps could be taken to initiate this policy change?
  6. Compile these elements into a 5 page document.  This 5 page limit does not include a cover page and references.  Revise to make the information accessible to a non-expert.  Edit for simplicity and clarity. Delete jargon, passive voice, extra words, etc. Use appropriate headings and sections to make it easy to follow each set of information or arguments.
  7. Prepare a one page briefing paper for policy makers.  Include plenty of white space. Use bullets, graphics, call-outs, etc. to make it interesting and possible to get the mail idea in less than 30 seconds.

 

Timeline

Week 1 - 5

  1. Sign up for a Science to Policy topic.
  2. Complete a review of the peer reviewed literature and summarize the state of the knowledge in this area.  Write this section of your paper in two, double spaced pages.
  3. Prepare a bulleted list of guidelines and recommendations made by national organizations and agencies.
  4. Prepare a list of potential policies that could be used to implement these recommendations.
  5. Prepare a list of discussion questions about the policy environment (who would support, who would oppose, motivations, feasibility, etc.), the state of the science about the topic and the strength of the argument to make changes based on that science, and your policy recommendations.

Week 6

 

  1. Email materials prepared in steps 2-5 to your fellow group members and to djohn@u.washington.edu
  2. Come to class on February 12 prepared to be an active participant in a small group discussion with others who have similar topics.

Week 7-10

  1. Compile drafts of the paper and policy brief based on the paper.  Edit for clarity.  Ask colleagues, friends, family to review.  Edit again.

Week 10

  1. Submit 5 page, double spaced  paper and one page policy brief.  

 

Evaluation:  Criteria for each Component

 

Points

Science to Policy Paper

Concise and comprehensive presentation of current state of basic science

10

Review of existing recommendations & guidelines

10

Policy options & analysis

10

Strength and organization of arguments made for chosen proposed policy change (s)

10

Organization of paper, flow, introduction & conclusions

5

Quality of references

5

Briefing Paper

Readability & ease of comprehension of short policy brief

5

Selection of information to include in policy brief

5

Total points

60

 

 

 

 

Return to Nutrition 531 Homepage