Here is list of the point distribution and expectations of the assigned labs. The basic allotment is 20 points, allocated according to:
This one is pretty self-explanatory. If it works as per the directions, then it works. Be sure to save the VI with the results showing.
The most obvious thing to consider here is that the wiring diagram be clean and readable (this means trying not to lay wires on top of each other, making it clear what wire goes to what terminal, etc). Also, the space should be used efficiently; avoid large blank spaces, fit everything onto one screen. Use of sub-VIs allows this. The other issue with readability is to make sure to "comment" parts of the code which may be obscure (for instance, labeling sequence locals in a sequence, or putting notes next to complicated operations). If you have any questions about sufficient readability, don't hesitate to ask.
Basically , what is required here is to include in the "documentation" portion of your VI's properties, some information about what the lab is attempting to do, how you've gone about it and what your results show. This is also where answers to any questions asked in the labs should be put.
Awarded for innovation, cleverness, artistic merits. That is, doing more that was expected, which adds to the analysis; more elegant ways to implement features (which must be explained if not obvious); nicely laid-out and or artistic front panels.
Submit to CollectIt . Be sure to save with the plots, and other output set as default.