Model A |
Model B |
n = 34 |
n = 46 |
|
|
s = 10 |
s = 18 |
(a) H0: m1 = m2
Ha: m1 ¹ m2
(b) z0 = 2.575 Rejection region: z > 2.575, z < -2.575
(c)
(d) Reject H0. The mean repair costs are not the same.
College Prep |
General |
n = 49 |
n = 44 |
|
|
s = 4.8 |
s = 5.4 |
(a)
H0: m1
- m2 ≤ 0
Ha: m1 - m2 > 0 (claim)
(b) z0 = 1.285 Rejection region: z > 1.285
(c)
(d) Reject the null hypothesis. You can support the claim made by the guidance counselor.
H0: m2
- m1 ≤ $20,500 [Alternate
form: H0: m1 - m2 ≥ -$20,500
Ha: m2 - m1 > $20,500 (claim) Ha: m1 - m2 < -$20,500 (claim)
Then conduct test accordingly for same result]
z0 = 1.64 Rejection region: z > 1.645
Do not reject H0. There is not enough evidence to support the claim.
95% CI:
H0: mA
- mB ≤ 0
Ha: mA
- mB > 0 (claim)
z0 = 1.645 Rejection region: z > 1.645
Reject H0. Would recommend Irinotecan to give pain relief longer. Enough evidence to support the claim.
H0: m1
- m2 ≤ 0 (claim)
Ha: m1
- m2 > 0
(a)
(b)
(c) tc = 2.65 Reject H0 if t > 2.65
The standardized test statistics, t, is not in the rejection region. Fail to reject H0.
(d) Not enough evidence to reject the claim.
(a) H0:
m1 ≤ m2
Ha: m1 > m2
(b) tc = 1.363 Reject H0 if t > 1.363
(c)
(d) Reject H0. There is enough evidence to conclude that the mean bumper repair cost is more for small pickups than for small utility vehicles.
Degrees of freedom = n1 + n2 – 2 = 15 + 12 – 2 = 25
tc = 2.060
90% CI:
Arby’s |
McD’s |
n = 15 |
n = 12 |
|
|
s = 2.42 |
s = 1.65 |
|
|
90% CI:
Degrees of freedom: 12 – 1 = 11 (assuming unequal variances)
tc = 1.796
(a) H0: md ≥ 0
Ha: md < 0 (claim)
(b) t0 = -3.143 Reject H0 if t < -3.143
(c)
(d)
(e) Reject H0. There is enough evidence to support the claim.
(a) H0: md ≤ 0
Ha: md > 0 (claim)
(b) t0 = 1.833 Reject H0 if t > 1.833
(c)
(d)
(e) Reject H0. There is enough evidence to support the claim.
Page 399, #24
t0 = 2.262
CA: 18.4% of 1500 is 276
OR: 20.7% of 1000 is 207
(a) H0: p1 ≥ p2
Ha: p1 < p2 (claim)
(b) z0 = -1.645 Reject H0 if z < -1.645
(c)
(d) Fail to reject H0. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of adult smokers in CA is less than in OR.
H0: pS ≤ pW
Ha: pS > pW (claim)
z0 = 2.325 Reject H0 if z > 2.325
Reject H0. There is enough evidence to support the claim.
95% CI: