Qualitative Methods in Educational Research (2006-2007)


Autumn Quarter Schedule

Note: * next to a reading indicates a qualitative research study.

Class #1
10/2: Introduction to Qualitative Research and the Course

This session will provide an introduction to the goals and purposes of this course. In this class we will:

  • Preview the main themes and activities of this course
  • Discuss what makes research qualitative

This course will employ a broad and inclusive conception of "qualitative research." Various traditions can and do lay claim to that label, and the differences among them are substantial: However, most share the following characteristics: in some degree they employ the researcher as the measuring instrument; they try to capture aspects or qualities of phenomena that cannot be (or are not easily) quantified; they tend to interpret human behavior, beliefs, and social action in a social and cultural context; they tend to focus on processes more then discrete outcomes discernable at a fixed point in time; and they tend to concentrate on a relatively small number of sites, subjects, or cases. In this class we will explore these and other characteristics, and examine them in relation to other forms of social science inquiry.

Required Readings:

  • *Fordham, S. (1988). Racelessness as a factor in Black students' school success: Pragmatic strategy or Phyrric victory? Harvard Education Review, 58, 54-84.

Assignments Due:

  • None

Class #2
10/9: Traditions of Qualitative Research and Their Places in Social Science Inquiry

This class will explore various traditions of qualitative inquiry. We will focus on several of these traditions in this course: ethnography, cognitive/sociocultural research on teaching and learning, and organizational/policy case study research. [Other qualitative traditions - e.g., historiography, oral history, narrative research, phenomenology - will not be our focus, though many of the issues we explore will pertain to them as well.]

In this class, we will concentrate on the following issues:

  • How do qualitative traditions differ in goals, underlying assumptions, and method?
  • How does the primary unit of analysis (e.g., the individual, the group, the organization, the policy) influence the choice of research strategy in each tradition?
  • What distinguishes one approach from another, and how can approaches be combined?

Required Readings:

  • *Geertz, C. (1973). Deep play in Bali. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures (pp. 412-454). New York: Basic Books.
  • Merriam, S.B (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chapters 1 & 2, pp. 3-43
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Chapter 1, pp. 1-22

Assignments Due:

  • Initial Description of Project Idea

Class #3
10/16: Problem Finding and Initial Project Design

The act of finding a researchable problem - a problem that can be illuminated by inquiry - is no small order. We agree with Einstein and Infeld, who wrote that: "The formulation of a problem is often more essential than its solution . . . To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old questions from a new angle, requires creative imagination and marks real advance in science."

Project design begins by locating a question worthy of study and continues through proposal development and into the research process itself. We will discuss how to "find problems," how to develop research or study questions, how to ground projects in a theoretical tradition, and how to develop research plans. We will address how formulating a theoretical or conceptual framework for a research study involves locating oneself in a set of assumptions, and how theory provides a lens through which to investigate the phenomenon under observation.

We will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of light and intensive project design prior to beginning data collection and will contrast design decisions that characterize different qualitative traditions. We will examine how the following issues are dealt with at the design stage: the specification of research questions, sampling, the design of instruments and data collection procedures, ethical and political considerations, cost and labor, and plans for data analysis.

Required Readings:

  • *Malen, B., Croninger, R., Muncey, D., & Redmond-Jones, D. (2002). Reconstituting schools: "Testing" the "theory of action". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 113-132.
  • Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chapter 3, pp. 44-67
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Chapter 2, pp. 18-25
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Chapter 2, pp. 23-53

Assignments Due:

  • None

Class #4
10/23: Overview of Qualitative Research Methods

In this class, we will provide an introduction to the panoply of methods that constitute qualitative inquiry. All too frequently, qualitative research is equated with ethnography. This is unfortunate since qualitative reserach is richer and more varied than ethnography alone. What methods are available to the qualitative researcher? When is it appropriate - if ever - to combine qualitative and quantitative approaches? Should one combine various qualitative methods in the same study, and, if yes, what are the advantages of doing so? Finally, we will begin to discuss issues of gaining access to research sites.

Required Readings:

  • *Dutro, E., Kazemi, E., & Balf, R. (2006). Making sense of "The Boy Who Died": Tales of a struggling successful writer. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22, 1-32.
  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: MacMillan. pp. 119-145 (up to "Data analysis and reporting")
  • (re-read) Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chapter 2, pp. 26-43

Assignments Due:

  • Identification of Model Paper
  • E-Post Discussion

Class #5
10/30: Issues of Observation and Participant Observation

In this class session we will focus on observation issues and techniques. We will explore the who, what, when, and where observation. We will also distinguish between participant observation (traditionally used in ethnography or sociocultural approaches), transitory observation (often used in organizational/policy case studies), and non-participant observation. Our discussion will focus on the following kinds of issues:

  • How do we interpret what we see?
  • To what degree should we challenge our interpretations and when should we try to learn to see events and behaviors as participants do?
  • How can we distinguish between illusion and reality, and is such a distinction even possible?
  • Do we see what we want to see or what we anticipate seeing? How do inferential and cultural biases color our perceptions?
  • Do we see only what is vivid and salient, and pay little attention to everything else?

Required Readings:

  • *Thorne, B. (1995). Learning from kids. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Chapter 3, pp. 54-79
  • Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., & Shaw, L.L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Chapters 1-3, pp. 1-65

Assignments Due:

  • E-Post Discussion

Class #6
11/6: Interviewing (Part 1): Semi-structured and Ethnographic Interviews

Interviewing in qualitative research covers a broad range, from open-ended conversational interactions to more formal, face-to-face interviews regulated by standardized topics or questions. The degree of structure depends on the nature of the study, the stage of data collection, and the types of respondents interviewed. We will discuss various features of interviewing. We will also discuss the level of structure or training we give respondents before they engage in a task we have designed.

In this course, we will concentrate on what are generally referred to as "semi-structured" or "unstructured" approaches to interviewing, a mainstay of ethnographic and many other forms of qualitative research. Discussion issues will include:

  • How much can we trust what people say?
  • Are unsolicited verbal accounts more trustworthy than those provided in response to our questions?
  • When does interviewing or probing get in the way of our learning about a person's feelings, cognitions, or perceptions?
  • How does the interaction between interviewer and respondent influence the way the respondent's story is (and is not) told?
  • Are there ways to overcome (or at least minimize) the "demand characteristics" of the interview?

Required Readings:

  • (re-read) *Fordham, S. (1998). Racelessness as a factor in Black students' school success: Pragmatic strategy or Phyrric victory? Harvard Education Review, 58, 54-84.
  • Seidman, I. (1998). Technique isn't everything, but it is a lot. In I. Seidman, Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (pp.63-78). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chapter 4, pp. 71-93
  • Oakley, A. (1981). Women interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research. London: Routledge.

Recommended Readings (for Additional Resource Material):

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Chapter 5, pp. 124-156
  • Patton, M.Q. (1980). Qualitative interviewing. In M.Q. Patton, Qualitative evaluation methods (pp.339-428). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Assignments Due:

  • E-Post Discussion

Class #7
11/13: Interviewing (Part 2): Cognitive Interviews and Human Subjects; Introduction to Human Subjects Clearance

This session will continue the discussion on interviewing. We will explore techniques involved in "think-alouds" and clinical interviews, common techniques in cognitive/psychological research.

Half of the class will be devoted to the question of Human Subjects clearance. We will go through the rationale, process, and steps to enable you to proceed smoothly through the Human Subjects process. A member of the Human Subjects Division staff will come to class to discuss this process. [This introduction will prepare you to draft a Human Subjects application due in the next class.]

Required Readings:

  • *Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13-26.
  • Powell, A.B., Francisco, J.M., & Maher, C.A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners' mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405-435.
  • Ginsberg, H. (1981). The clinical interview in psychological research on mathematical thinking: Aims, rationales, techniques. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1, 4-11.
  • (To be handed out in the previous week's class) A complete Human Subjects Application.

Assignments Due:

  • Methodological Sketch

Class #8
11/20: Revisiting Design Issues and Other Dimensions of Data Collection

This class will revisit matters of overall design to explore further questions of sampling (choices of settings, informants, time periods, etc.), conceptualization, data collection strategies, data recording strategies, etc.

We will also address questions of recording data. It is impossible, and usually unnecessary, to record everything that goes on in a social setting. Note taking, tape recording, and videotaping are typically used to record data. We will discuss the relative merits of each approach, given the types of research questions asked by the investigator. Issues to be discussed include:

  • How do we distinguish between essential and extraneous data in the heat of the research situation?
  • What factors influence the choice of recording method (e.g., cost, labor intensity, rapport, nature of setting, etc.)?
  • Optimal fidelity to the performance: How close can we get? At what cost? For what purpose?

Class time will also be devoted to discussing strategies for facilitating access to a field site; students will have the chance to share and examine each others' strategies.

Required Readings:

  • *Heath, S.B. (1982). Questioning at home and at school: A comparative study. In G. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chapters 6 & 7, pp. 112-150
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Chapter 7, pp. 175-204

Assignments Due:

  • None

Class #9
11/27: Learning from Case Studies and Writing the Research Proposal

One of the most frequent products of qualitative work is the case study, or, in many qualitative research designs, multiple cases of a phenomenon under study. Cases take many different forms, including case studies of students, teachers, classrooms, "effective schools," policies, educational practices, and so on. Strictly speaking, "case study research" is not a single tradition of qualitative inquiry, but rather a broad category of inquiry activity that falls in various traditions. In this class we will examine these questions:

  • What is the unit of analysis in a case study?
  • How can we generalize from a case study? To what are we "generalizing"?
  • What is the relationship between case studies and theory development?
  • What does it mean to "generalize within a case"?
  • How does the inclusion of multiple cases in a study design affect the unit of analysis, the generalizability of findings, or the contribution to theory development?
  • How do disciplinary perspectives determine the shape of a case study?

We will discuss the craft of writing a cogent research proposal.

Required Readings:

  • *Cohen, D. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 327-345.
  • Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chapter 10, pp. 207-212
  • Przeworski, A., & Salomon, F. (1995). The art of writing proposals: Some candid suggestions for applicants to social science research council competitions. Social Science Research Council, Unpublished document.

Assignments Due:

  • Human Subjects Application (1st draft)
  • E-Post Discussion

Class #10
12/4: Ethics and Politics of Qualitative Research

Ethics are a concern to all social scientists; no one wants their research to cause harm. No matter how careful researchers are, however, they often face ethical dilemmas. For example, a sponsoring agency may want all of the data collected in the project even though it contains sensitive information. One may also discover that findings are used for unintended purposes. One may negotiate access on certain conditions and later feel compelled to violate those conditions, particularly when unethical or harmful behavior is observed. At the root of these issues are questions of competing goods, power, the rights of those studied (versus the rights of others), and the researcher's responsibilities to others. We will discuss the following issues:

  • Are ethical dilemmas in qualitative studies inevitable? What's avoidable? How different are the ethical dilemmas that crop up in qualitative studies from those that occur in other research modes?
  • Can the researcher avoid taking sides in local or inter-organizational power struggles? If the answer is no, whose side is the researcher on?
  • Human Subjects standards: What are our ethical responsibilities vis-a-vis the "subjects" under study?

Required Readings:

  • Baca Zinn, M. (1995). Insider field research in minority communities. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
  • Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chapter 10, pp. 212-218 (Ethics)
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Chapter 10, pp. 263-287

Assignments Due:

  • E-Post Discussion

Class #11
12/11: Looking Around and Looking Ahead

The process of conceptualizing, reflecting, and re-conceptualizing typically results in the need to fine tune one's research before accessing sites and beginning one's study. During the final class session, students will act as "critical friends" to one another by anticipating challenges and issues and offering collegial support and guidance.

Assignments Due:

  • Revised Human Subjects Application and Attachments (ready for submission)
  • Research Proposal

Home

Send mail to: amandao@u.washington.edu
Last modified: 4/11/2007 6:58 PM