When: Winter 2008, 5 Credits
Where: Lecture M, W 10:30-12:20, Winkenwerder 105
Lab / Discussion Section: W 1:30-3:20; Bloedel 261
Instructors:  John Marzluff, 123E Anderson, 616-6883, email: corvid@u.washington.edu, office hours M:1:30-2:30 or by appointment
                   David Peterson, 15B Anderson, 732-7812, email: wild@u.washington.edu
Guest Lectures by Morris Johnson, email: h20proof@u.washington.edu
Class e-mail Listserve: esrm450a_wi08@u.washington.edu

·       Purpose: This course is designed to give advanced undergraduates and graduate students entry into the current practices of wildlife ecology and conservation with a focus on forest landscape ecology, processes, and conservation.  We will draw heavily from the current primary literature in this field to survey what is evolving and emerging as important theoretical, methodological, and conceptual foundations. This class requires a solid foundation of understanding in Natural Science Disciplines (including Forest Resources, Biology, Zoology, Environmental Studies, and Comparative Psychology), and quantitative approaches to ecology and conservation (especially basic statistical reasoning and GIS).

·       Objectives:1) Introduce you to current thought in the field of wildlife and forest conservation; 2) Immerse you in the primary wildlife conservation and forest landscape ecology literature; 3) Increase your comfort with new ecological paradigms including scale, emergence, disturbance, and patch dynamics; 4) Increase your familiarity with analytical methods to quantify and project landscape change; 5) Increase your understanding of local, regional, and global conservation issues; 6) Improve your ability to work in interdisciplinary settings to solve problems, devise conservation strategies, and plan effectively.

·         Required Text: None

·         Helpful Text Resources (all on reserve at Natural Sciences Library (Allen South, 1st Floor):

Liu and Taylor. (editors) 2002. Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University Press.

Bissonette. (editor) 1997. Wildlife and Landscape Ecology. Springer.

Hunter. (editor) 1999. Maintaining biodiversity in forested ecosystems. Cambridge University Press.

·         Teaching Approach:  Class meetings are a combination of lecture, discussion, and workgroup activities.  The general approach is to use cooperative learning through interaction between students and instructors and especially among students.  We assume that all students will read the required scientific papers, lecture notes, and other assigned material BEFORE each class meeting.  Failure to do so will not impact the instructors, but will impact fellow students with whom you interact during class.  In many cases, the success of a student team will depend on the full participation of each team member.  Your commitment to do the required readings, attend and participate in class will enable us to have focused discussions that explore scientific literature and concepts more effectively.

·       Lecture outlines and references will be available on Professor Marzluff’s website (accessed from lecture and lab schedules below). You are encouraged to get these before class and embellish them during lecture. Podcasts of the basic messages in each lecture are also available on the website.  It is best to listen to these prior to lecture and again in review for tests. Lectures are designed to probe important concepts, not cover all material in the chapters or readings. We will illustrate ideas in lecture with examples and bring current conservation issues to your attention.

·       Readings.  The readings are on reserve in the Natural Sciences Library and available online (from UW home page, go to Library home page and then to course reserves).  Readings are designed to supplement lectures and provide a broad background in wildlife science.  Readings are also designed to point you toward the primary scientific literature.

·       Class discussions.  Small student and faculty groups will discuss each lecture topic.  Prior to discussion each student will search the last 2 years of literature and bring an article of relevance to the current topic and of interest to the student to diversify the discussion.  Groups will follow instructor-provided suggestions to discuss important topics covered in lecture and will report their insights to the full class.

·       Lab sessions.  Weekly laboratory sessions will explore scientific and technical approaches to analysis, planning, and management.  A combination of individual and team activities will focus on specific techniques and computer applications.  The ultimate focus of these activities will be to provide insights into sorts of data and analyses you will need to integrate with lecture concepts for your final project.

·       Midterm.  There will be a comprehensive midterm exam over the first 2/3 of the course material.  It will be a takehome exam that includes short answer and essay questions as well as data interpretation.

·       Final Project.  The class will culminate with a long-term research plan focused on wildlife issues in the Cedar River Watershed.  You will work individually and in teams to synthesize the lecture and lab material and apply the concepts, theories, and quantitative approaches you have learned to understand and quantify wildlife populations and habitat.  More details on this year’s project follows.

Emerging Wildlife Issues in the Cedar River Watershed

The Cedar River Watershed, just East of Seattle provides a critical ecosystem service to our city—it is a major source of clean water.  It also provides an expansive (80,000 ha), lowland coniferous forest with minimal disturbance and therefore high quality wildlife habitat.  The City of Seattle recently entered into a Habitat Conservation Plan for the watershed so that it can function as a water source while minimally affecting endangered salmonids and native forest species like cougars and Pileated Woodpeckers.  Part of the HCP is to increase the old forest structural properties by a series of ecological thinnings.

This year’s class project will introduce you to the HCP and quantitatively assess the implications of thinning for wildlife species and fire risk.  You will be responsible for assessing tradeoffs in wildlife habitat and fire risk. Teams will determine the habitat quality of the watershed from the perspective of one species (e.g., cougar, Pileated Woodpecker, or Winter Wren).  This will involve quantitative assessment of habitat elements in management units within the watershed (areas that have a similar management and disturbance history), development of a habitat quality map of the watershed for their species, and quantitative examination of the landscape (e.g., patch size) from the perspective of your species.   In addition we will take a larger spatial scale look at Cedar River and determine how it might best fit into the newly released Washington State Biodiversity Strategy.  The final group project will be an oral presentation of: 1)the habitat needs of your species, 2) how those needs are currently met in the CRW, 3) how the proposed thinning of the watershed might affect your species, and 4) a spatially explicit plan for how to increase the habitat quality of the watershed for your species.  This is due during the final class period.  The final individual project (due March 17) will be a written discussion of single versus multiple species management focusing on how managing for your species affects the suitability of the watershed for the species researched by each of the other groups.

·       Grading:  Your grade will be determined by your exam scores and discussion projects.  Excused absences and prior notification are required to receive make-up exams or delay assignments.  IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to let us know you will be unable to take an exam or turn in an assignment.  Make-up exams may be written or oral, at the instructor's discretion.  Assignments turned in late for unexcused reasons will be accepted, but discounted 15% for every week they are late.  Total points will be determined in the following way:

o      Midterm 100 pts.

o      Class Discussion  100 pts

o      Final Team Project 200 pts.

o      Final  Individual Project 100 pts.

o      Lab 200 pts. (based on completion of exercises)

§       TOTAL 700 pts.

o      Final grades are assigned according to the following scale:

§       A = 3.5 - 4.0 90-95+%

§       B = 2.5 - 3.4 80-89%

§       C = 1.5 - 2.4 70-79%

§       D = 0.7 - 1.4 60-69%

§       F = 0 <60%

o      Final Project DUE DATE: March 17 (Monday) by NOON

Home

Syllabus of Lecture Topics

 Date

                Lecture Topic

 Literature

1/7

Introduction and Objectives (JM)

Systems Thinking (DP)

 

Daniels and Walker 2001,

Group Assignment for Wed Discussion: West Nile Virus or Amphibian Stressor

1/9

 Ecological scale (DP)

New paradigms—patches and equilibria (JM)

Podcast

Discussing Disease

 

Peterson and Parker 1998

 

Kilpatrick et al. 2007

Belden and Harris 2007

1/14

Sandy Nickelson, Seattle Public Utilities

New Issues in a changing world (JM)

Lecture      Podcast1

Literature    Continue of Podcast

Read about Cedar River HCP and

Cedar River Watershed

 

Lambin et al. 2001, Chapin et al. 2000, Harvell et al. 2002

1/16

Ecological disturbance: natural vs. human-caused  (DP)

Parminter 1998, Hunter Chapter 4

 

1/21

Martin Luther King, Jr. HOLIDAY

 

1/23

 Biodiversity, Economics, Ethics (JM)

Lecture      Podcast

Literature

Balmford et al. 2002, Stenseth et al. 2002

 1/28

Forest Structure and Pattern (DP)

Scale of Forest Structure and Pattern

Frelich & Reich 1995

1/30

Manging Forests for Multiple Objectives

Lertzman and Falls 1998

Haufler 1999

2/4

Fragmentation, Corridors, Reserves  (JM)

Podcast

Literature

Opdam & Wiens 2002, Beier & Noss 1998, Tallmon et al. 2003

2/6

Fragmentation, Corridors, Reserves (JM)

Podcast

Lomolino 1999, Cabeza and Moilanen 2001, Margules & Pressey 2000

2/11

Populations and Metapopulations (JM)

Podcast

Literature

Hanski and Simberloff 1997

 

2/13

Populations and Metapopulations (JM)

 Harrison and Taylor 1997

2/18

Holiday - President's Day

 

2/20

Populations and Metapopulations (JM)

 Wiens 1997

2/25

Midterm

 

2/27

Spatially-explicit Population Models (JM)

Statistical Inference (JM)

Literature

Robinson and Wainer 2002

Johnson 2002

3/3

Scale, Emergence and Habitat Use (JM)

Resource Utilization  (JM)

 Marzluff et al. 2004

3/5

Managing Dynamic Landscapes

Public Land Management, Decision Making, and Policy  (DP)

Hunter Chapter 12

 

3/10

Climate Change Considerations  (DP)

 Lovejoy et al. 2005

3/12

Group Presentations of Lab Projects

Red-legged Frog

Fisher

Northern Goshawk

Pileated Woodpecker

Each individual has to prepare a final project on how managing for their team species affects the other 2 species and in general how to manage for multiple species in CRW

 

Home

Syllabus of Lab Section Topics

 
 

Wednesday LAB

 

Date

Activity

Assignment

 

1/9

What is Habitat and How do you Measure it?

Cedar River Watershed HCP

Washington State Biodiversity Strategy

Morrison 2002, Group rating of species habitat requirements

Browse the CRW HCP website

Browse the Biodiversity Project Website

1/16

Introduction to Simulating Landscape Management

Forest Inventory Methods  for Habitat Classification

Combining data from several survey protocols

Explore web site prior to class; complete class exercise

1/23

Simulating Ecological and Restoration Thinning: Benefits and Tradeoffs (costs and fire)

Class exercise

1/30

 Virtual management of the CRW Landscape

Simulate and evaluate thinning and fire risk reduction scenarios for CRW

2/6

Habitat Implications of CRW Management—generating a habitat cover map for 3 species of concern (cougar, Pileated Woodpecker, Winter Wren)

Reclassifying landcover into species-specific habitat in ARCVIEW 

Navigating ARCVIEW

New Users should look at an introduction to arcview like this  Before class

Class exercise

2/13

Quantifying the Bigger View of CRW

Biodiversity Conservation Opportunity for CRW

Patch Analyst

 Review Web Site Prior to Class, Class exercise

2/20

Planning for species of concern

 

Each group proposes how to manage CRW for their species

2/27

Cougars in the CRW—assessing their movement

Animal Movement

 Review Web Site Prior to Class, Class exercise

3/5

Animal Movement

Class exercise

3/12

Resource Utilization

 Review Web Site Prior to Class, Class exercise

Home