CEE 440 Gilbane Gold - An Engineering Ethics Case Study Video
The case
takes place in the imaginary town of
David
Jackson, a young Z-Corp civil engineer , finds himself
in a predicament. Z-Corp is a computer
chip manufacturer and is currently discharging lead (and arsenic) at the
allowable wastewater concentration limits set by the city of
Gilbane
had aggressively marketed itself as a city with a good business climate,
offering tax incentives to industries that chose to move there. After several high-tech firms moved to the
area, the more stringent wastewater discharge regulations were enacted. Z Corp was one of the companies that moved to
Gilbane. Its Gilbane plant manufactures computer components, but the
plant's manufacturing process creates substantial quantities of toxic
materials, primarily heavy metals. Z
Corp monitors its sewer waste discharge monthly.
Two facts
about the regulations affect the resolution of the case. First, plants in Gilbane
are responsible for supplying wastewater analytical test data to the city. The
data must be signed by an engineer, who attests to its accuracy. The law governing effluents is flawed,
however, for it only regulates effluent discharge in terms of the concentration of the toxic material in
the discharge, not in terms of the total mass emission rate of the toxic
pollutant. So a plant can always operate
within Gilbane standards by simply increasing the
volume of discharge.
Second, a
newer and more sensitive (but also more expensive) analytical test for heavy
metals (lead & arsenic) has been developed since
the city enacted its emission standards.
The newer test is not required by the city, and the city of
Cast Of
Characters
Z Corp Employees
Diane Collins: Z Corp vice
president in charge of the Gilbane plant (plant
manager). She reports to corporate
headquarters, and is the sole representative of the plant who does so. She is
reported to by: Frank Seeders: In charge of the plant operations, an
engineer.
and PE
responsible for signing Z-Corp plant wastewater effluent reports and keeping
the plant in compliance with regulations.
Dan Martin: Z Corp. lawyer from the
corporate office.
Non-Employees of Z-Corp
Tom Richards: Environmental
engineering consultant who was fired by Z Corp.
He has a new analytical test which shows the Z-Corp is discharging
excessive toxicwaste in its wastewater effluent. He also encourages David to blow the whistle
on Z Corp.
Lloyd Bremen: Former state commissioner
of environmental protection, now retired and a farmer who uses Gilbane Gold sludge on his ranch. Though he oversaw the regulations when he was
State Commissioner, he now is critical of the rules regarding the analytical
testing of sewer effluent from plants such as Z-Corp.
Dr. Winslow Massin:
Professor emeritus, Hanover University, School of Engineering.
Maria Renato: TV Reporter who does the up-close piece on Z
Corp.
CEE440 Questions: Name:
___________________________________________________________
Ethical Issues Of The Case
1. What
does David Jackson decide to do about the excess toxic emissions into the sewer
from Z-Corp? ____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
2. Does
the TV presentation of the case by Maria Renato
affect the decision made by
David Jackson? __________________________________
3. In
what ways does the fact that David's boss (Diane) is not an engineer affect
David's actions?
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
4. Does
Professor Massin add any insight into what actions
David should perform?
That
is, would you look to a former professor to help you deal with an ethical
issue?
_________________________________________________________________________________
5. If
you were David where would you look for advice on how to handle this?
_____________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
6.
The plant manager
(Diane) is presented with conflicting reports from her employees.
How could David have presented (communicated) his
concerns more effectively to the plant manager (Diane)? ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
7. Do
you think Z Corp is "poisoning" the soil at the present levels of
lead discharge into the sludge? ________________________________________________________________________________
What about the planned 500% increase in
lead discharge levels after the Z-Corp plant is expanded? _________________________________________________________________________________
8. Do
you think David is deceiving the city if he does not reveal the results of the
new analytical tests? ____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
9. Regardless of whether David is
deceiving the city, is failing to reveal the results of the new analytical
tests for lead and arsenic concentrations in the Z-Corp
wastewater effluent justified? _________________________________________________________________________________
10. What were the plant manager Diane's actions
on this issue of excess toxics in Z-Corp's effluent?
__________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
11. Do you think plant manager Diane's actions
are unfair to David? _________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
12. Do you think the City is treating Z Corp
unfairly? ________________________________________
13. Should the City bear some of the expense of
complying with its strict wastewater effluent standards?
________________________________________________________________________________
14. Do the actions of the ex-consultant
environmental engineer Tom Richards seem in any way to have
ulterior motives? _____________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
15. Does David have any other options that he
did not consider in this video?
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________