Home Page
Syllabus
Schedule
Case Studies
- AA -Water
- AB - Shelter
- AC - Solid Wastes
- AD -Food Safety
- AE - Lower 9th Ward
Page contents:
Introduction
Cases
Class Presentations
Written Report
Evaluation
Resources:
PBS Katrina Video Map of New Orleans
A Shared Uncertainty
|
Winter Quarter 2006
Case Studies
Introduction
A significant part of this course involves exploring a case study in population
and health. Each section has been assigned one of five cases that
we believe affect human health and pose significant social or political
implications for human well-beings. The TAs will divide each
section into a series of stakeholder groups. Those groups represent
different
perspectives (though coalitions may form); will identify the major
issues of concern to them; determine a course of action that addresses
these concerns; and be prepared to present and debate the issue from
the point of view of their stakeholder group.
Each stakeholder group will present testimony before a Congressional
subcommitte investigating governments' response to the disaster
in determining whether or not legislative or
other action
should be initiated.
T herefore,
the
stakeholder groups must make cogent arguments to the committee
detailing the issues and their particular concerns.
For example, taking a case from previous years, if one of the case
studies involved Eschericia coli in food, the four stakeholder groups might be: a meat packing
plant, a fast food restaurant, the state department of health,
and a law
firm representing the victims of a foodborne outbreak linked
to E. coli served at a fast food chain. The subcommittee was weighing
whether
government inspections should be increased, or left to self-regulation.
The meat packing plant might form a coalition with the restaurant,
and argue for self-regulation over government regulation of meat
inspection.
Remember, the focus of this course is on Population and Health,
therefore, each stakeholder group (and the section as a whole)
needs to focus
its effort on those issues related to the health of the population(s)
concerned.
The Cases: DRAFT Scenarios - Please note that these are subject to
change at this time.
Section AA |
Gulf Coast Disaster: Water Quality
Scenario: In the wake of the 2005 hurricanes, the public water treatment and distribution systems were disrupted,
if not destroyed. Displaced persons stranded in their homes or
in shelters, and rescue and relief workers all need to have safe
drinking water in order to survive, and to provide for basic sanitation
needs. Meanwhile, many cities were flooded with potentially contaminated waters.
Possible Stakeholders: Municipal officials (e.g., the mayor of New Orelans), CDC/NCEH/EHSB, local or
state health departments, shelter occupants, the American Red
Cross, etc..
Your hearing has been scheduled for Monday, February 28, 2006 at 12:30 a.m. in
Law 127 on the University of Washington campus. |
Section AB |
Gulf Coast Disaster: Shelter
Scenario: During the 2005 hurricanes, Many people were forced to flee their hoomes, abandoing clothes,
furniture and most of their other possessions. For days, weeks and months they have been unable to get back to their homes.
In many cases there is nothing to go back to. Homes were destroyed or damaged by the flood waters. Many structures that were not destroyed by the actual flooding have been made
uninhabitale and perhaps unfixable by the subsequent hot, humid
climatic conditions and the growth of mold. Displaced persons stranded in their homes or in shelters, and rescue and relief
workers all need to have a dry, safe place to live, and that meet
their basic sanitation needs.
Possible Stakeholders: Municipal officials (e.g., the mayor of New Orelans), CDC/NCEH/EHSB,lLocal or
state health departments, shelter occupants, the American Red Cross,
etc.. Your hearing has been scheduled for Wednesday, March 2, 2006 at 12:30 a.m. in
Law 127 on the University of Washington campus. |
Section AC |
Gulf Coast Disaster: Solid Waste
Scenario: Shortly after the worst of the flooding from 2005 hurricanes abted in New Orleans, it was estimated that there was 2 billions
pounds of garbage that needed to be collected and disposed. This is just the garbage and debris from inside peoples homes and businesses.
It does not include demolition debris, abandoned and ruined vehicles, appliances
and other such items. .
Possible Stakeholders: Municipal officials (e.g., the mayor of New Orelans), CDC/NCEH.EHSB, Local or
state health departments, shelter occupants, Public Works Departments,
etc. Your hearing has been scheduled for Friday, March 4, 2006 at 12:30 a.m. in
Law 127 on the University of Washington campus. |
Section AD |
Gulf Coast Disaster: Food Safety
Scenario: In the wake of the 2005 hurricanes, the distributionof food was severed in most areas. Displaced persons stranded in their homes or in shelters, and rescue and relief
workers all need needed food. With interrupted rail an truck service there was no way to get food to those
that needed it, at least for the initial period. Meanwhile, many cities were flooded with potentially contaminated waters that
covered what food stocks remained in the cities. There are 3 distinct issues: (1) providing safe food to displaced person, rescue and relief workers, in areas
with out refrigeration or even cookign facilities, (2) Re-estbalishing
food supply, storage and distribution systems, and (3) dealing with
whatever food supplies might have remained in the affected areas.
Possible Stakeholders: Municipal officials (e.g., the mayor of New Orelans), CDC/NCEH.EHSB, Local or
state health departments, shelter occupants, the American Red Cross Your hearing has been scheduled for Monday, March 7, 2006 at 12:30 a.m. in
Law 127 on the University of Washington campus.
|
Section AE |
Gulf Coast Disaster: Rebuilding the Lower 9th Ward
Scenario: One of the most severely impacted neighborhoods during 2005 hurricanes, was the lower 9th Ward of New Orleans. This historical low income and predominantly black neighborhood is located below
sea level and was just about completely flooded Most of the homes were either outright destroyed or so badly damaged as to be
uneconomical and possible unsafe to try repair. The question here is, Should the lower 9th Ward be rebuilt or shold the people
who lived there be relocated?.
Possible Stakeholders: Municipal officials (e.g., the mayor of New Orelans), Builders, Residents.
Your hearing has been scheduled for Wednesday, March 9, 2006 at 12:30 a.m. in
Law 127 on the University of Washington campus. |
Class Presentations
The class presentation will take the form ofa public hearing (before a subcommittee
of a Congressional Committee). The instructors will conduct the heating
while the TAs will perform as if
they were
the sergeant at arms -- organizing the
groups presenting testimony. Each stakeholder group will testify before
the hearing body by:
A. Preparing an oral presentation consisting of:
1. Identification of your stakeholder group and its relation to the
issue
2. A concise outline (transparency or PowerPoint slide) of the main
points of your presentation
3. Discussion of the cause of the problem in general which your group's
solution will address
4. A plan that will prevent the spread of the problem (Keep in mind
that convincing solutions must be politically and socially feasible
and economically
viable)
5. A least one original data graphic (transparency) to support your
argument
6. A set of stapled handouts (one for each of the other stakeholder
groups, plus one for the two TAs and the instructors)
Note that because of time constraints (each group will only have approximately
6 minutes to make their case), only one or two students in each stakeholder
group should speak during the
main
presentation.
The remaining
tasks (e.g. forum question, graphics construction, handout) should
be divided by the other students in the group. Your handout should
clearly
list the division of labor.
B. Preparing at least one question (30 seconds maximum) to be directed at one of the opposing stakeholder groups that will serve to
either point out the strength of your group's position or a weakness
in theirs. The question nned to be concisely stated, addressed to one
or more of the other stakeholder groups in your section presenting
testimony at the hearing. This question should reflect your stakeholders
perspective, and highlight weaknesses of omission
or commission in
the other stakeholders presentation.
Written Paper
In addition, each group must write an essay from
the point of view of their stakeholder group or of a particular facet
of their stakeholder group. The final paper should be between 5-10 pages
long, and should include graphics (charts, tables, figures, etc.) and
proper references and citations.
It should:
1. Include all elements that are listed above under oral presentation.
2. Provide an overview of the problems of the case study and your group's
relation to them.
3. Describe your stakeholders proposed solution. Support and/or critique
the solution based on your stakeholder perspective. Specifically identify
why the plan will succeed or fail given that critique.
Evaluation of Case Studies
Both the oral presentations and the papers will be graded on:
1. their explanation of the problem and how their group relates to/is affected
by the problem
2. the persuasiveness, feasibility and originality of their proposed solution
3. the quality of their graphics and handouts, and
4. the thoughtfulness and efficacy of their forum question.
A single grade will be assigned to the paper. A separate grade will be assigned
to the oral presentation and discussion.
Because this portion of your section grade invovles a group effort and we know
from experience that not all members of the group may contribute equally
-- although we hope that everyone does -- we will adjust each student's
score for the case study based on the evaluation of their peers. That
is, each
member of the stakeholder group will be required to evaluate the contribution
of each member of their stakeholder group (including their own) according
to the criteria provided in your sections and using the form provided.
We will then tabulate the scores and calculate a deviation from the mean.
This may result in points being either added or subtracted from the
group grade for an individual student. For instance if in a stakeholder
group of 5 students, 2 were evaluated by their peers as contributing
more than most, 2 were rated as being about average, and one was rated
as contributing very little, and the presentation and paper were assigned
a "B" grade, the two students who contribute most might get an A, the
other two would get the B reflected by the group effort, and the under-performing
student might receive a "C" or "D", or possibly even an "F". So be warned.
|