English 497/498: Adapting Texts, Spring 2006

Has a substantive thesis and essay fully addresses the topic; the thesis is defendable, clearly explained, and supported in the body of the essay
Shows substantial depth, fullness and complexity of thought
Uses adaptation theory to shape and develop argument; theory is integral component of the essay
Expresses ideas clearly and commands the reader’s attention
Demonstrates clear, unified and coherent organization
Is fully developed and detailed with arguments supported by persuasive reasoning and references to text; there is an appropriate balance between providing evidence and analyzing that evidence
Has a sophisticated style (remarkable variety of sentence pattern, smooth transitions between ideas, superior control of diction)
Properly cites source material
Has few, if any, minor errors in grammar, usage or mechanics

Has a clear thesis and essay addresses the topic but may not do so completely; the thesis may be clear and well-argued, but could use additional support or development
Shows some depth and complexity of thought
Uses adaptation theory to shape or develop argument but references to theory may seem tacked on rather than closely connected to the essay’s claims
Expresses ideas clearly
Demonstrates effective organization
Is well developed with sensible reasoning and appropriate references to text; however, some evidence may detract from the thesis and some ideas might not be fully explored
Demonstrates balance between evidence and analysis for the most part, but balance may be weak in places
Has an effective style (some variety of sentence patterns, transitions between ideas, accurate diction)
Properly cites source material, but may have errors in citation format
Has few errors in grammar, usage or mechanics

Has a thesis that may not be entirely clear and essay does not fully address the topic
Shows insufficient awareness of the complexity of issues addressed; may treat the topic simplistically or repetitively
Demonstrates little engagement with adaptation theory, offering a few citations of theoretical texts, but not tying the references to the essay in a clear manner
Communicates ideas clearly for the most part, but may have some lapses in clarity
Has a recognizable organizational pattern, but the relation among parts is not consistently clear enough to provide a coherent focus
Is unevenly developed; writer may offer sufficient reasoning or references to text for some of the ideas but not for others
Demonstrates some balance between evidence and analysis
Has an adequate style (limited variation in sentence patterns, transitions between most ideas, diction accurate for the most part)
Cites the majority of source material, but occasionally material may be clearly cited but not referenced in parentheses
Has some errors in grammar, usage or mechanics, but demonstrates basic control of these areas

Has an unclear thesis; essay discusses the topic and meets basic length requirements, but does not address the topic in any meaningful fashion
Lacks focus or demonstrates confused, stereotyped or simplistic thinking; writer may demonstrate no overall conception of the issues raised by the topic
Demonstrates misunderstanding of adaptation theory, including references that have no connection to the essay’s ideas
May not communicate ideas clearly
Is ineffectively organized, with no clear relationship between the parts of the essay
May not provide adequate or appropriate reasoning or references to support generalizations, or may provide details without generalizations
Demonstrates little relationship between evidence and the thesis
Has stylistic weaknesses (no variety of sentence patterns, few transitions, imprecise diction)
Indicates use of source material, but does not have consistent parenthetical references
Has occasional major errors in grammar, usage or mechanics or frequent minor errors that interfere in the reader's understanding of the essay

Has no thesis or has an incomprehensible thesis that does not engage the topic
May be deliberately off-topic and demonstrate no understanding of the issues addressed by the topic
Does not engage adaptation theory
Does not communicate ideas clearly
Lacks coherent organization
Shows no development of ideas; may simply summarize text
Has an incoherent style (difficulties with sentence structure, pattern of diction errors)
Presents another writer’s work as the author’s own
Has pervasive pattern of errors in grammar, usage and mechanics that renders the essay unreadable