Lab 4 (due 2/2 11:59pm)
The goal of this lab is once again to continue development of your
test suite on the one hand, and to refine your starter grammar on the
other. Again, the test suite will include phenomena not covered
by the customization system (but on the agenda for the rest of the
quarter). The grammar work will include adding some new phenomena as
well as whatever clean-up is required to get to a good starting point.
Back to top
The first task is to create positive and negative example sentences
illustrating the following phenomena, to the extent that they
are relevant for your language:
Before you start, read the general instructions for
testsuites and the formatting
Back to top
This week we'll do another round of grammar improvement
through the questionnaire. This time, you'll need to address these sections:
- Matrix Yes-No Questions
- Adnominal possession
- Clausal complements
- Clausal modifiers
- Nominalization (if applicable)
- One of:
- Valence changing lexical rules (actually in Morphology)
- Argument optionality
- Other changes to Lexicon and Morphology (as appropriate)
An additional goal for the starter grammars for this week is to get
to the best possible starting point. I will try to get feedback
to you from Lab 3 quickly, and my feedback will contain suggestions
of what to clean up.
In addition, you should do the following:
- Review your grammar's performance over the test suite (using
[incr tsdb()]) to determine whether there are any examples that you think should parse which currently don't.
- Use interactive unification to determine the source of the parse failure, and post to Canvas to get ideas about how to fix it.
- Likewise, if you are overgenerating, post to Canvas for ideas on how to fix it. In some cases, the advice might well be "we'll fix this later".
- For the examples that do parse, examine the semantic representations (Simple MRS) to check whether the dependencies look correct. That is, are the nouns showing up as the arguments of the verbs, and in the way you would expect? Do you see correct values for tense, aspect, person, number and (where relevant) gender on the event and individual variables?
- If you have any incorrect semantic representations, post to Canvas for advice on how to fix them.
Back to top
Make sure you can parse individual sentences
Once you have created your starter grammar (or each time you
create one, as you should iterate through grammar creation and
testing a few times as you refine your choices), try it out on a
couple of sentences interactively to see if it works:
- Load the grammar into the LKB.
- Using the parse dialog box (or 'C-c p' in emacs to get the parse
command inserted at your prompt), enter a sentence to parse.
- Examine the results. If it does parse, check out the semantics (pop-up menu on the little trees). If it doesn't look at the parse chart to see why not.
- Problems with lexical rules and lexical entries often become apparent here, too: If the LKB can't find an analysis for one of your words, it will say so, and (obviously) fail to parse the sentence.
Note that the questionnaire has a section for test sentences. If
you use this, then the parse dialog will be pre-filled with your test sentences.
Back to top
[incr tsdb()] profile
The final step for this lab is to use the [incr tsdb()] grammar
profiling system to test the performance of your starter grammar over
your test suite, and then examine the results. (You may find in doing
so that you want to refine certain aspects of your starter grammar.
You can do this by uploading the file "choices" which comes with your
grammar into the customization system and then tweaking from there.)
We expect to see an overall drop in coverage this week (since
you'll be adding sentences that we don't expect to parse yet), but
at the same time, some improvement over the subset of your test suite
that represents the last two weeks.
Create a test suite skeleton
- From previous weeks, you should already have a tsdb directory
with subdirectories skeletons and home.
- The skeletons subdirectory should have files Relations
- Use make_item to create
a new item file from your current testsuite.
- You can replace skeletons/lab2/item (or skeletons/lab3/item) with this new file,
or create a new subdirectory in skeletons called lab4.
In that case, you'll need to copy skeletons/Relations to
skeletons/lab4/relations, put your new item in
skeletons/lab4/, and edit Index.lisp to add a line
for the lab4 skeleton.
Create and run an initial test suite instance
- Start the lkb
- Load your starter grammar. (The script file is in matrix/lkb/script.)
- Start [incr tsdb()] (within emacs, that's M-x itsdb)
- In the [incr tsdb()] podium, select Options > Database Root
and input the path to tsdb/home.
- In the [incr tsdb()] podium, select Options > Skeleton Root
and input the path to tsdb/skeletons.
- Optional: For future use, you can set these variables
ahead of time in a file called .tsdbrc in your home directory.
It should contain these lines, with path names edited appropriately:
(setf *tsdb-home* "path-to-tsdb/home")
(setf *tsdb-skeleton-directory* "path-to-tsdb/skeletons")
- In the [incr tsdb()] podium, select File > Create. You should
see your test suite in the menu there. Select it, and get a test suite
instance. Post to Canvas if this doesn't work.
- Make sure your grammr is loaded into the LKB.
- Once you have a test suite instance, select it (by clicking on it),
then do Process > All Items.
- Explore the results, with functions such as Browse > Results and Analyze > Competence.
- Be sure to save (i.e., not overwrite or delete) this test suite
instance, as you'll be asked to turn it in.
Back to top
NB: While the test suite and choices file creation
is joint work, the write up should be done by one partner (the
one who didn't do it last week). The writing partner should
have the non-writing partner review the write up and make suggestions.
Your write up should include the following:
- Documentation of the phenomena you have added to your testsuite,
illustrated with examples from the testsuite.
- Documentation of the new or revised choices you made in the customization
system, illustrated with examples from your test suite. (Diff your lab3 and lab4 choices files to make sure you've caught all the changes.)
- This can be interleaved with the documentation of the phenomena
(so you describe each phenomenon and then the choices you used to add
an analysis of it to the grammar), but the documentation of the phenomenon and choices should be logically separate. Here's an example of what this should look like.
- Descriptions of any properties of your language illustrated
in your test suite but not covered by your starter grammar and/or
the customization system. This will be most of the additions to your
test suite this week. Here, too, please include IGT from your testsuite,
and give explanations along the lines of the example above (though without
the information about the customization system).
- Documentation of the coverage of your grammar over the testsuite.
If there are examples that thare parsed incorrectly (unanalyzed
grammatical examples, analyzed ungrammatical examples, or grammatical
examples assigned surprising parses), reflect on why that might be.
- Documentation of any changes you made to your grammar to improve
its performance (coverage and accuracy). Include the exmaples that
motivated the change and explain what changes you made to the
choices file or tdl.
Back to top
Back to top
Back to course page