Home

Midterm Review

Essay

Final Review


BACK TO TOP

Last Updated:
03/07/11


Film History, 1960-1988

     Comparative Literature 312    

Winter 2011



Exams and Essay

Midterm Review (download as pdf)

 

Part I: Identification (20-30%)

In the identification section your response should answer the “who,” “what,” “where,” “why,” and “when” questions as precisely as possible. Needless to say, it’s not difficult to identify where the Czech New Wave took place; and given that the class is limited to roughly a 30-year period (with a few years from the 1950s and 1990s included on either end), the “when” questions should not be too complicated, at least when discussed in the most general terms. But a complete answer should go into much greater detail. Which films and filmmakers help launch and define each of these movements? Which critics and manifestoes are influential at the beginning or during the development of the movement? How do you mark the beginning and the end of each era? Even the obvious “where” question can be answered more precisely: which cities, which studios, which exhibition locations, etc., are involved in each of these phenomena? A perfect answer should supplement information provided in the lectures with additional material learned from the course reading.

 

Possible Identification Terms

French New Wave

Cahiers du cinéma

Auteur theory and the politique des auteurs

The Left Bank Group

François Truffaut

Jean-Luc Godard

Agnès Varda

Taiyozoku films    

Japanese New Wave

Czechoslovak New Wave

International Art Cinema

Cannes Film Festival

Imperfect Cinema & Third Cinema

New German Cinema

 

Part II: Analysis (70-80%)

This section will consist of two or three clips from films listed on the syllabus (i.e., from films that were screened in their entirety, not from films that were only introduced through excerpts in class). First, you’ll be asked to identify the title, director, and year of the film. Second, you will be asked to analyze the important formal and stylistic aspects of the sequence (what you see and hear in the clip). Which elements of the cinematography, mise-en-scene, and editing are particularly remarkable? Third, you’ll be asked to discuss the relationship between this sequence and the film as a whole. Which formal or thematic features are introduced, developed, or resolved at this moment in the film? Fourth, which aspects of this sequence help us understand the relationship between this film and others introduced in the class and the reading? Is the style or narrative consistent with broader trends in filmmaking during the period covered in the course?






Essay Guidelines

Procedure

The overall purpose of this assignment is to give you an opportunity to view and analyze a film or group of films from the perspectives introduced in the topics below. The paper should be 6-7 pages, typed and double-spaced. The due date is Friday, March 11). You should email the document to me on the 11th. Make sure you check your inbox over the weekend and early the next week in case I have trouble opening the file. The paper should have an evocative and informative title, a thesis (not a general topic, but a specific position that must be argued and supported), and the necessary evidence to back up that thesis. Film studies is a field with a number of different methodologies and approaches to its subject matter, so that evidence can take many forms, ranging from statistical information about box office receipts to biographical information about the people involved in the making of a film, from responses by film critics to the theoretical concepts introduced in the reading. But most of all the evidence will be drawn from the film itself. Although this assignment does not call for a sequence analysis or shot-by-shot breakdown, you may want to identify a crucial segment from the film and discuss it in depth. This process will ensure that your analysis remains rooted in the specifics of what you see and hear on screen.

Paper Topics

1) Violence: The representation of violence—especially the graphic or aestheticized representation of violence—has been a subject of significant controversy in American film throughout the century of cinema, but especially since the 1960s. Each of the films screened in the section on the new Hollywood cinema contains at least one significant act of violence, and several conclude in a hail of gunfire. Using at least one of the films screened for this course after the sixth week, examine both the manner in which violence is represented and the function this violence serves within the film itself. This essay can focus on one particular film or sequence, or it can be comparative and cumulative and therefore make claims about a group of films or a historical period more generally. Whatever its precise subject matter, the paper should consider both the formal aspects of the film—how it represents violence, which details the camera and soundtrack foreground, whether the film departs from or attempts to imitate a documentary-like recording of events, etc.—and the significance of these particular scenes in the film as a whole and the cultural context in which the film was produced and received.

Variation: At least two landmark films from the 1970s contain scenes that are explicitly concerned with the effects of violent or otherwise provocative images on the mind of a viewer subjected to quasi-scientific tests or experiments. In The Parallax View (Alan J. Pakula, 1974), a corporation hiring assassins uses a graphic slide show as part of a psychological evaluation of its potential “employees.” In A Clockwork Orange (Stanley Kubrick, 1971) violent images become a means of psychological retraining and aversion therapy, among other things. In this variation on the first assignment, you can compare and contrast the representation and function of these two sequences in The Parallax View and A Clockwork Orange, with the same level of attention to the way these images are constructed and their significance within the film as a whole. You can also compare and contrast one or both of these sequences with one of the other films screened for the class.

2) Space: Nearly every film screened this quarter takes great pains to explore the environment where the story takes place, from the vast landscapes of Badlands and Red Sorghum to the small towns of Bonnie and Clyde to the plastic suburbs of The Graduate to the apocalyptic wasteland of Weekend to the "spacescapes" of 2001 the cityscapes of Breathless, The 400 Blows, Cléo from 5 to 7, Memories of Underdevelopment, Ali: Fear Eats the Soul, Taxi Driver, and Raging Bull. In most cases these locations are not merely the backdrop for the narrative; they become significant objects of attention and inquiry for the filmmaker. Using at least one of the films screened for this course, examine both the manner in which the environment is represented and the function this setting serves within the film itself. This essay can focus on one particular film or sequence, or it can be comparative and cumulative and therefore make claims about a group of films or a historical period more generally. Whatever its precise subject matter, the paper should consider both the formal aspects of the film—how it represents these spaces, which details the camera and soundtrack foreground, etc.—and the significance of these particular spaces in the film as a whole and the cultural context in which the film was produced and received.

Resources for Writing about Film

Barsam, Richard. Looking at Movies: An Introduction to Film. New York: Norton, 2004.

Bordwell, David and Thompson, Kristin. Film Art: An Introduction. Seventh edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.

Corrigan, Timothy. A Short Guide to Writing about Film. Fourth Edition. New York: Longman, 2000.

http://www.dartmouth.edu/~writing/materials/student/humanities/film.shtml

http://classes.yale.edu/film-analysis/





Final Review (download as pdf)


Part I: Identification (20-30%)

As on the midterm, the identification section on the final requires that you answer the “who,” “what,” “where,” “why,” and “when” questions as precisely as possible. You will be responsible for some terms and concepts from the first six weeks of the course, but most come from the material covered after the midterm. Because we spent more time on American cinema from the 1960s onward, your answers to questions on American film should strive for a greater level of detail. In particular, you should discuss the changing structure of the American film industry, as outlined in the lectures and the King and other readings. Identifications of Martin Scorsese and Zhang Yimou should present information gathered from their films and from the Kolker and Lu readings. A perfect answer should supplement information provided in the lectures with additional material learned from the course reading.

 

Possible Identification Terms

International Art Cinema

The New Hollywood

     The Hollywood Renaissance

The “cinema of sensation” (Monaco)

The blockbuster

High concept movies

Stanley Kubrick

Martin Scorsese

China’s “Fifth Generation”

Zhang Yimou

 

Part II: Analysis (70-80%)

Again like the midterm, this section of the final will consist of two or three clips from films listed on the syllabus (i.e., from films that were screened in their entirety, not from films that were only introduced through excerpts in class). First, you’ll be asked to identify the title, director, and year of the film. Second, you will be asked to analyze the important formal and stylistic aspects of the sequence (what you see and hear in the clip). Which elements of the cinematography, mise-en-scene, and editing are particularly remarkable? Third, you’ll be asked to discuss the relationship between this sequence and the film as a whole. Which formal or thematic features are introduced, developed, or resolved at this moment in the film? Fourth, which aspects of this sequence help us understand the relationship between this film and others introduced in the class and the reading? Is the style or narrative consistent with broader trends in filmmaking during the period covered in the course?




jtweedie@u.washington.edu