Affordability and Density         

Overview

Pros/Cons

Facts

History

Interview

Affordability/Density

Reference

    
Affordability of Condos

 

Although the homeownership rate has remained fairly stable over the past decade, Seattle has experienced a dramatic increase in home prices.  This increase in home prices has caused a shift in who can afford a home in Seattle.  In 1990, a family of four earning 80% of the area median income could afford to buy 18.4% of all homes in Seattle.  In 2000, that same family of four could only afford 8.8% of Seattle’s home sales.  The lack of affordability has continued to increase and has become an even bigger problem today.  Today, a family of three living in Seattle would need to earn 120% or more of the area median income in order to afford a median-priced home.

 

Seattle Housing Values and Affordability

 

                                                1990                            2000                            % Change

Median sales price for              

single family homes                   $137,900                     $270,000                     95.8%

 

Median income (family 4)          $41,500                       $66,000                       59.0%

 

Percentage of home sales          18.4%                          8.8%                            -52.2%           

Affordable at 80% AMI

 

Source:  Seattle Housing Levy Renewal; Homeownership case statement.

 

 

As you can see from the table, the median sales price for homes has increased dramatically.  The shortfall in the number of housing units built compared to the increase in population and job creation has limited new housing and driven Seattle housing costs very high.  Condos are a key element in creating more housing units in small areas, therefore leading to more affordable housing.  Generally, the size and ownership process of condominiums causes them to be more affordable than single-family homes.  As opposed to a house, when you purchase a condo, you are just purchasing the actual unit and not the land it sits.  With land so scarce and expensive around most metropolitan areas, people are turning to condominium development as the most practical way to own a home and utilize real estate.

 

Condominiums can be a cheaper alternative to a single-family house, but due to their tremendous increase in value over the past few years, this has begun to change.  On a national basis, condominiums have appreciated about twice as much has single-family homes, therefore closing the price gap between condos and homes.

            There has been eight consecutive years of condominium growth in Seattle.  The value of Seattle condos has outpaced the value of homes.  The median price of condos in Seattle is $175,000.  The latest trend in condo ownership is the downsizing by the “empty nesters”.  They are moving from the suburbs into more urban areas for the social atmosphere and the livable size of condominiums for two people.  In Seattle, 42% of condo owners are 45 years old or older.

Source: Northwest Cable News Story:  5/23/04.

                                      
Condominiums = Density = Land Preservation

 

 

Seattle’s population growth and the dream of homeownership have lead to urban sprawl and the development of suburbs.  Suburbanization has caused land to become more and scarcer with time.  We have now implemented an urban growth boundary, which has limited developable land.  The urban growth boundary has limited the housing supply, increased housing demand, therefore driving housing prices up.

 

In order to create more affordable housing and preserve more of our land, we must make efficient use of the urban land.  This means we must change the way in we live and create more density.  Rather than spread out housing developments containing huge houses with huge lawns, we have to develop high density housing units.  This has been a goal of King County, and below you can see that densities have improved in most areas of King County.

 

 

                                   

Source: 2003 King County Annual Growth Report.

 

 

The percent of development in the urban area of King County has gradually increased to about 96% in 2002, with just 4% occurring in the rural/resource areas. In comparison to the 1996 – 1998 period, the proportion of new development taking place in the rural areas has been cut in half.

 

            This increase in urban development is important for land preservation and sustaining our rural areas and resources.  Condominiums are a major part of urban housing, and the increased development of condos has lead to more homeownership opportunities within urban areas.

 

 

 

 

 

Source: King County Annual Growth Report.

 

 

Overall, the cities and urban areas of King County are showing a clear trend toward achieving higher densities and more efficient use of land within the urban areas.

 

            One of the most positive influences that condominiums have on an area is the promotion of increased densities.  High density living helps to preserve land and makes very efficient use of land. 

            High density also creates some negative aspects for areas.  Parking, privacy, and other social problems can become an issue when living in dense areas.  This is discussed more in the negative affects of condominiums.

 

                                                                

Overview

Pros/Cons

Facts

History

Interview

Affordability/Density

Reference

  Contact