Peer review

• Benos et al (2003) How to review a paper gives principles of peer review and discusses elements of the process.
• Provenzale & Stanley's A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript (Note that this paper has been published twice, once in 2005 and once in 2006 (with permission from the initial publisher)
• Academic Medicine published a chapter on review criteria.  It is long and comprehensive with a different authorship list for each section.  Its length may be a deterrent, so here is a compilation of the criteria most important for statistical reviews.

REFERENCES

Dale J. Benos, Kevin L. Kirk and John E. Hall Advan in Physiol Edu 27:47-52, 2003.

Provenzale, James M., and Robert J. Stanley. "A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript." Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology 34.2 (2006): 92-99.

LINK: "Review Criteria." Academic Medicine 76.9 (2001).