The Memories of War Mapping Project

ARCHY/ANTH 101: Anthropology of War

University of Washington—Spring 2008

 

Course Overview

Schedule

Projects

 Resources

 

Project summary:

Our goal is to create an interactive memory map of Seattle which charts how the material and social landscapes of Seattle are the legacies of wars marked and unmarked, local and elsewhere. The collective efforts of the class will be placed on a central, virtual map. Our quarter will be divided into three project segments, described below. 

 

Click here to view the course Memory Map

             

 

Part 1: Mapping the physical remains and memories of war in Seattle

Overview:

Maps are abstractions of space and like other abstractions, are created and used by people tell stories. Maps are also tools of war itself. Most innovations in mapping (from compasses to Global Positioning Systems) are the products of military innovation. This project will give you experience in archaeological survey and mapping techniques by creating a map of the material remains of war and war memorials in Seattle. Seattle has been the site of many group conflicts in the past. These include pre-1850 battles between different Native American groups, post 1850 conflicts between Euro-American settlers and Native American groups (including the 1851 “Battle of Seattle”), anti Chinese riots and attacks in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, labor conflicts in the 1920s and 30s, the industrial growth and new immigration to Seattle during WWII, and more recent anti-war and anti-WTO battles, among others. Seattle also has many war memorials (both intentional and accidental), physical reminders of wars fought here and elsewhere. Some of these places may be buried under new development, others may have been destroyed and exist only in memory or the archives.

 

Tasks:

For this part of the class project, you will

1) Through your own research, you will find at least one site of a physical remain or memorial to war in Seattle and visit it in person. This site could be one of the historical categories above, or perhaps some other way of grouping: “street battles in the WTO protest”, or “local responses to global war”, “memorials of obscure and forgotten wars”, etc. We will spend one section meeting brainstorming possible ideas for these.

 

2) You will visit your site and make an archaeological sketch map of it. You will use our Google Map based data entry tool to find the exact location of your site and get its latitude and longitude coordinates.

 

3) You will create an electronic image file of your sketch map (in jpeg format) and email that file, along with the latitude and longitude coordinates of your site and a short written description to your TA. Your TA will upload your files to a course Memory Map, where your sketch map and description will be viewable by other students in the course. Your goal is to allow people who have not physically visited your site to see a description of it, including what it looks like, how big it is, and how it relates to the landscape around it. Another student will use your map for an analysis in Part 3 of this project (see below).

 

Training:

We will provide all training in how to make an archaeological field sketch map. We will cover this in more detail in class and in sections. You will not need any specialized equipment.

 

Detailed instructions:

Click here for details on creating your sketch map and other details about completing and submitting this project assignment.

Map Data Entry Page (use to find the latitude and longitude of your site)

 

Evaluation:

Click here for details on how the instructors will grade this assignment.

 

Part 2: Interviews about war

Overview:

What most people know about war they know through storytelling.  This is true not only for those far from the battlefront, but even for those with firsthand experience of violent conflict.  Storytelling is the medium by which combatants, witnesses, survivors, their friends and families all come to terms with violence and create memories from it.  What can, and what cannot, be told about histories of violence shape who we are and how we think about the world around us.

 

This project invites you to engage with the complexities of memory making by recording oral histories from Seattle area residents with stories to tell about war.  Our goal is to trace how these narratives shape the identities and everyday experiences of people in our community – and how those stories work to shape our community.  Wars in Europe, Latin America, Asia and Africa were important catalysts to various waves of immigration to the Pacific Northwest.  The continuing violence in parts of East Africa directly impact how many Seattleites interact with one another and narrate their understandings of home, culture, and history.  The histories of wars fought in the Seattle area are often untold or “under-heard,” but are nevertheless critical to how we live in and experience the city.  The way memories of wars in Southeast Asia intersect with the on-going wars in Iraq and Afghanistan structure the way many of us – especially young people – feel about our families and friends, our nation, and our future.  By placing these interviews on our map, along with the visual archives of wars on the Seattle landscape, we are exploring the ways in which the material and narrative environments overlap to create a “war-scape” that connects seemingly disparate locations in space and in time.

 

Tasks:

1) Identify one person you would like to be the focus of an ethnographic interview about war memories.  How you define what constitutes a war memory and why you choose to work with this person is up to you, but be prepared to talk about those choices in the terms we have been working with in this class.  You will obviously need to ask permission to do this, so be sure you outline in detail what you would like to interview this person about and receive written consent to conduct your interview.  (A consent form is available here)

 

2) Decide how the interview will be archived.  Your end result needs to be an MP3 file, 3-5 minutes long.  You may do any one of a number of things including:

 

Included in your recording needs to be a short introduction with your name and a brief statement regarding who you are talking to and what you are talking about.  Please note that it is OK if your interviewees prefer to remain anonymous.  If that is the case, please work with the person to find a language for describing the subject of the interview in a way that makes them comfortable.

 

3)  Research the topic about which you hope to speak with this person.  You will be asking someone to share what might be very personal, perhaps even painful memories.  You need to honor your interviewee’s time and their story by being as prepared as possible.  Even if you are conducting the most open ended of interviews, you need to be able to follow the thread of the narrative and engage the person you are speaking with in a meaningful way.

 

4)  Design the interview.  We will go over some of the varieties of interviews in class, and there are many possibilities.  But you need to decide in advance whether you will, for example, read from a list of prepared questions or whether you will take a more open ended, conversational approach.  You will need to choose a location to conduct the interview and think through the implications of doing the interview in one space as opposed to another.  Whatever format you choose, you will need to do some preparation. There is no fixed time for how long these interviews need to be.  That will be up to you and your collaborator.  They do, however, need to be longer than the 3-5 minutes of the final version.  If you need a rough guide, you might consider that 45 minutes to an hour is about the average attention span for something like this – but that is only a rough guide.  Interviewing is an art, not a science.

 

5) Establish in advance with your interviewee what role she or he would like to play in the editing process of the interview.  It may be that you edit the narrative together.  Interviewees may simply request the chance to hear your selections before you submit them for the class, or may not care what you do with the material.  But you need to be sure to establish in advance what role each of you will have in cutting down the interview.

 

6) Edit the interview or narrative you are working with into a 3-5 minute segment mp3 file.

 

7) Use our Google Map based data entry tool to find the exact location of your site and get its latitude and longitude coordinates.

 

8) Email the lat/lon coordinates, a descriptive title for your interview, and the mp3 file (as an attachment) to your TA by Friday, May 16, 5PM

 

Training:

We will teach you basic interview skills and procedures, how to use digital recorders, create and edit the MP3 files.

 

Detailed instructions:

Detailed instructions for finding audio recording equipment on campus and creating MP3 files

How to use the Difficult Dialogues recording equipment

Consent form for interview

Map Data Entry Page (use to find the latitude and longitude of your site)

Cheryll Alipio's Step By Step Guide to Interviewing

Online tutorial for editing with Audacity

 

Evaluation:

Click here for details on how the instructors will grade this assignment.

 

 

Part 3: Map reflections, analysis and dialogue

 

Overview:

This course is, in some ways, a map in itself.  While we have elaborated a number of themes, ideas, histories and questions, our real work has been to position these in relation to one another and to position ourselves within them.  We have been mapping a warscape.  This final assignment is an opportunity to make that (re)positioning explicit.

 

Task:

1) For this part of the project we ask you to select two survey points on our collective map.  One of these should be the result of Part 1 (“Mapping the Physical Remains and Memories of War in Seattle”) and one should be the result of Part 2 (“Interviews about War”).  Neither of these can be your own project submission.  We want you to work with someone else’s material. You should also avoid someone else’s work on a site that you worked on. Choose two entirely new sites from the map.

 

2) Plot a virtual line between these two sites on the map.  This will mean writing a short paper (4 - 5.5 full double-spaced pages not including title page or bibliography, 12 point font, 1 inch margins) that analyzes the connection between these two points.  There are, of course, many ways in which this can be done.  You might compare and contrast these two points, examining common conceptual and historical threads or points of divergence.  You might ask what historical forces have led to one of these sites being “memorialized” in one way and the other forgotten, ignored, or resisted.  The important thing to remember is that your job is to map these sites in relation to one another and (as in all maps) to the context that surrounds them. You should relate your essay to themes presented in the class (in lectures, sections, readings, etc.). Be sure to properly cite other people’s ideas and include a bibliography. You may use any style of citation you’d like, but be consistent throughout your paper. For more information about how to reference other’s work, see http://lib.washington.edu/research/wri.html

 

3) Your paper should include a separate title page, including ALL of the following information:

1.      Your Essay Title:

2.      Your Name:

3.      Your section number:

4.      Name and author of the two sites you analyze:

a.       Project part 1 (map) title:

b.      Author of project part 1:

c.       Project part 2 (interview) title:

d.      Author of project part 2:

 

4) Save your paper as a Word document (.doc file), titled with your UW Net ID (file should be named “xxxx.doc” where “xxxx”= your UW Net ID. If you are using Word 2007, save as “Word 97-2003 document”. Do not send a “.docx” format that Word 2007 defaults to.

 

5) Email your paper to your TA by Wednesday, June 11 at 5 PM.

 

6) in your email text, indicate whether or not you give the Difficult Dialogues Project Staff permission to use your paper in the Difficult Dialogues website and report. Please use the following wording: “I do/do not (use one) give permission to the Difficult Dialogues Project Staff to use my paper in the Difficult Dialogues website and report”

 

Please note that the paper is the default option for this assignment.  With the prior permission of your TA, you may select another genre (a film, audio file, prose piece) in which to complete this assignment.  But you MUST discuss this with your TA in advance.  Otherwise you will be expected to turn in a paper.

 

Evaluation:

Click here for details on how the instructors will grade this assignment.