The purpose of this project is to evaluate the impact of the nutrition interventions in an elementary school so that school environments and policies can be optimally designed to support healthy food choices. Students will work with Seattle Public Schools’ nutritionists to organize, conduct and analyze lunchroom observations, student surveys and key informant interviews of parents and school staff in two Seattle elementary schools. One school has additional resources through a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Healthy Eating by Design (HEBD) initiative, and the USDA Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program. The HEBD project at the school is called "Eat Better, Feel Better." The other school does not have these additional resources and will serve as a "control" or comparison school.
Students will develop a report, briefing paper and abstract that will be presented and disseminated to state and local school nutrition administrators. The project will be divided into "deliverables." Students will work on these deliverables in teams.
Background Briefing Paper
Analysis Plan (May 4)
Lunchroom Observations
Lunchroom Observation Powerpoint
Completion of the Lunchroom Observation Forms
Key Informant Interviews
Template/Script for Interviews with Teachers/Staff/Administrators
Template/Script for Interviews with Parents/Guardians
Interview Scheduling Chart
Key Informant Interview Presentation (PPT for 4/21 Class Training)
Hard Copies of the Following Materials Distributed in Class:
Key Informant Interview Handbook
Questions Frequently Asked By Respondents Insert
Proposal for Distribution of Tasks & /Timeline
Prepare a well referenced briefing paper that outlines the current state of knowledge about the food environment in schools and homes, policies that impact these food environments and interventions that seek to improve these environments. This paper will be based on a search of medical and social work publications databases, the "grey" literature of web sites and publications sponsored by the government and non-profit organizations.
Prepare a 30 minute presentation for classmates and other stakeholders.
Using key references on observational techniques to assess dietary intake, develop an observation protocol to assess dietary intake in the school lunchrooms.
Develop a plan for recording, compiling and analyzing student survey data and lunchroom observation data from the two schools.
Prepare a 40 -50 minute, hands-on training and observation practice session for your classmates.
Prepare a basic key informant interview procedure manual (that includes importance of confidentiality and Human Subjects issues and a brief discussion of the uses and quality of qualitative data) for your classmates. There are several good resources on the Web. You might want to start with a good general overview, Conducting Key Informant Interviews and progress to more details with The Survey Kit,
Develop a plan for compiling and analyzing the results of the interviews.
Develop a plan for distributing incentives to parents who complete the interviews.
Conduct a pilot of the interview guide and procedures with at least 5 respondents, including parents of grade school children, teachers and school administrators.
Prepare a 40-50 minute basic hands-on raining on organizing and conducting key informant interviews for your classmates.
About 3 pages that can easily be scanned by policy makers in less than 5 minutes. Key results and recommendations should stand out. Data should appear in tables or charts. The document should include a concise summary, bullets and plenty of white space.
March 31 |
Introduction and BackgroundKirsten Frandsen, Katy Busby
Mary Podrabsky
Donna Johnson
Getting Organized
|
April 7 |
Work with team on Phase One deliverables.
|
April 14 |
Work with team on Phase One Deliverables and other tasks to prepare for data collection |
April 21 |
Present Phase One DeliverablesDivide into New Action Teams and Plan for Next Steps |
April 28 |
Data collection and data entry |
May 5 |
Data collection and data entry |
May 12 |
Data collection and data entry |
May 19 |
Data collection and data entry |
May 26 |
Work with Team on Phase Two Deliverables |
June 2 |
Work with Team on Phase Two Deliverables |
June 6 |
Group Presentation |
Points | |
Group |
|
Each of the protocols, briefing papers, plans for data collection, analysis and distribution\, presentations and training demonstrate comprehension and appropriate application of basic concepts learned in class for cultural competence, evidence based practice, practical program evaluation, and relationships with coalitions and partnerships. | 85 |
Organization and presentation of final products | 15 |
Individual |
|
Successful participation in steps of phase one, data collection, data compilation and analysis, and product development. Evaluation methods will include evaluations from site supervisors and observation during classroom activities. | 40 |
Role in phase one and final presentations | 10 |
Rating of individual effort by other members of group | 50 |
200 |